JUSTICE WADHWA COMMITTEE
PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
Retail Distribution (Fair Price Shops)
Appointment of retail outlets
Viability and condition of Retail Outlets
Problems faced by beneficiaries
Vigilance, Enforcement and Complaint Mechanism
Composition and Functioning of Vigilance Committees
Identification of Beneficiaries
In the matter:
Writ Petition (C) No. 196/2001 – People’s
1. Hon’ble Supreme Court of
3. Committee submitted report on
of the task assigned to the Committee thus having been enlarged, the Committee
projected to the Department of Food & Public Distribution, additional requirements
of staff, space and delegation of financial powers for its smooth
functioning. The Department dilly dallied and did not meet
the requirements. The Committee had to
Committee is submitting report of the State of
6. No one has doubted the utility of PDS being the need for supply of food grains to the poor of the country at affordable rates. Procurement and distribution of food grains is a huge and gigantic task but then the whole system is built on corruption. There are more leakages and maladministration and benefits to the poor are low. Inefficiency and corruption has made PDS corrupt at several levels. The system lacks transparency, accountability, monitoring and enforcing. Survey is not being conducted regularly and properly, with the result people Above Poverty Line (APL) have been issued Below Poverty Line (BPL) cards and those eligible for BPL cards have been ignored. Bogus cards are in abundance. Immediate measures are required to reduce the diversion of food grains. Delivery systems under the PDS have to be improved so that the real beneficiary gets its due entitlement at fixed price, fixed quantity, fixed time and wholesome quality. Innovative methods are required to improve the system. The whole system has to be totally revamped and modern technology would appear to be the only answer.
(Justice D.P. Wadhwa)
Central Vigilance Committee on
Public Distribution System
1. By an order dated July 12, 2006 passed in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 196/2001 Supreme Court constituted this Committee and directed that the Committee shall look into the maladies which are effecting the (public distribution) system, and also suggest remedial measures.
2. In particular the Committee was asked amongst other things to focus on;
a) The mode of appointment of the dealers,
b) The ideal commission or the rates payable to the dealers,
c) Modalities as to how the committees already in place, can function better, and
d) Modes as to how there can be transparency in allotment of food stock to be sold at the shops
3. It was further ordered that while dealing with the question of mode of appointment, the committee shall also suggest as to a transparent mode in selection of dealers. The Committee was also directed to indicate as to how more effective action can be taken on the reports of the vigilance committees already appointed. The Committee was required to invite suggestions from the general public, organizations and consider suggestions, if any received, in the proper perspective.
4. The Supreme Court observed that there is large scale corruption involved and hardly any remedial steps are taken to put an end to this. The ultimate victim is the poor citizen who is deprived of his legitimate entitlement of food grains. The Public Distribution System is intended to ensure that a citizen gets the food grain at a reasonable price keeping in view the economic standards.
5. These directions were initially given for the Government of
Delhi and to be followed on all
6. The Committee submitted the report relating to
7. The maladies affecting the Public Distribution System in Orrissa can be broadly classified into the following categories.
Ø Identification of the beneficiaries Below Poverty Line (BPL)
Ø Diversion of food grain meant for Targeted Public Distribution System (TPDS)
Ø Failure in the processes of implementation
Ø Failure of the vigilance mechanism
Ø Non existent machinery for enforcement
Each of these problems have been dealt in detail in the report under separate chapters.
I. IDENTIFICATION OF BPL
1.1 The PDS Control Order 2001 provides that the State Governments shall (i)formulate guidelines for the purposes of identification of families living Below Poverty Line (BPL) including the Antyodaya families as per the estimates adopted by the Central Government. (ii) Care will be taken to ensure that the families so far identified are really the poor. (iii) Exercise of identification of BPL and Antyodaya families, wherever it has not been done already to be completed within three months of the issue of the PDS Control Order, 2001.
1.2 In the meeting held with the senior Government functionaries in
the State of
1.3 The Central Government laid down the following guidelines for implementing the Targeted Public Distribution System:
(I) Identification of beneficiaries of the Targeted Public Distribution System (TPDS) namely the population Below Poverty Line (BPL) and issue of food grains at specially subsidized rates are the most important features of the TPDS. To work out the population Below Poverty Line (BPL) it is proposed to adopt the provisional estimates arrived at by the Planning Commission for the year 1993-94 adopting the methodology of constituted by the Planning Commission under the Chairmanship of Late Prof. Lakdawala (Expert Group). According to the official methodology so far adopted, the number and percentage of Below Poverty Line population for 1993-94 works out to 14.98 crores persons and 16.82% respectively. As per the Expert Group methodology this works out to 32.03 crores and 35.97%. The Expert Group methodology according to the Deputy Chairman, Planning Commission gives “poverty estimates closer to ground reality” and as such it is proposed to adopt them for the Targeted PDS.
(II) While these estimates give the number of persons and percentage of BPL population at State Level, identification at the micro level of the population Below Poverty Line can be done as indicated below :-
i) The quinquennial surveys made by the Ministry of Rural Areas and Employment for Implementation of IRDP, etc. on household living Below Poverty Line can be a basis. However, the overall number identified should be limited within the population Below Poverty Line as fixed by the Union Planning Commission adopting the methodology of the Expert Group by Late Prof. Lakdawala.
ii) Gram Panchayats and Gram Sabhas should be involved in the initial identification of eligible families.
iii) Final identification should be made after verification of doubtful cases.
iv) As regards urban population, slum dwellers will generally qualify for the Below Poverty Line. Applications, if any, received from non-slum areas should be verified to identify eligible beneficiaries.
v) The thrust will be to include only the really poor and vulnerable sections of the society such as landless agricultural labourers, marginal farmers, rural artisans / craftsmen such as potters, tappers, weavers, blacksmiths, carpenters, etc. in rural areas and slum dwellers and persons earning their livelihood on a daily basis in the informal sector like porters, coolies, rickshaw pullers and hand-cart pullers, fruit and flower sellers on the payment etc. in urban areas.
vi) The above criteria is indicated only by way of illustration and is in no way an exhaustive list of those who could be brought within the ambit of the Below Poverty Line. The total number identified, however, should be within the limits of Below Poverty Line population indicated by the Planning Commission.
1.4 The perusal of these guidelines would show that the Survey made by the Rural Development Department of the State could be a basis but the overall number of BPL identified by the State had to be limited within the limits prescribed for BPL by the Union Planning Commission adopting the methodology of the Expert Group headed by Late Prof. Lakdawala.
1.5 The State Government adopted the Ministry of Rural Development (MoRD) survey of 1997 without laying down any criteria or undertaking any BPL survey which resulted in large number of inclusion and exclusion errors. The Central Government thereafter approved the MoRD survey of 2002 in 2005 to form the basis of BPL census. The State Government has yet not adopted the same though more that three years have passed. This has resulted in a clamour for BPL cards and problem is now becoming a headache for the District Administration. Further the failure of the State Government to provide guidelines to work out the BPL population has resulted in the number of BPL ration cards exceeding the estimates of the Planning Commission.
1.6 To work out the population below the poverty line under the
TPDS, there was a general consensus at the Food Minister’s conference held in
August 1996, for adopting the methodology used by the expert groups set up by
the Planning Commission under the Chairmanship of Late Prof. Lakadawala. The BPL households were determined on the
basis of population projections of the
Registrar General of
1.7 The number of BPL families has been increased w.e.f. 1.12.2000 by shifting the base to the population projections of the Registrar General as on 1.3.2000 instead of the earlier population projections of 1995. With this increase the total number of BPL families is 652.03 lacks as against 596.23 lack families originally estimated when TPDS was introduced in June 1997.
1.8 The food allocation to the State is made by the Centre according to the numbers of BPL estimated on the basis of the findings of the Expert Group headed by Late Prof. Lakdawala. As a result, each BPL family in the State which is entitled to 35 Kg of grain per month is getting only a reduced quantity of 25 Kg of grain for month.
1.9 The PDS Control Order 2001 provides that the State Governments shall get the list of BPL and Antyodaya families reviewed every year for the purposes of deletion of ineligible families and inclusion of eligible families.
1.10 It was admitted before the Committee by the State Government
functionaries that no such review of BPL families is being done in the State of
1.11 The PDS Control Order 2001 provides that the State Government shall ensure that no eligible applicants is deprived of a ration card under the PDS. Apparently, due to the absence of proper criteria and the absence of review large number of people entitled to the benefits under the PDS have been denied such benefits.
1.12 The PDS Control Order, 2001 further provides that the State Government shall conduct periodical checking of ration card to weed out ineligible and bogus units in ration card. Ration card shall be valid for a period of five years from the date of its issue unless it is suspended or cancelled earlier. A ration card shall be issued afresh or reviewed after fresh verification of and such other checking as may be prescribed by the State Government in this regard.
1.13 No such exercise has been undertaken by the State Government. No checking for weeding out of ineligible or bogus ration cards or bogus units in ration cards has been undertaken by the state.
1.14 The PDS Control Order 2001 also provides that elimination of bogus ration cards as well as bogus units of ration cards shall be a continuous exercise by the State Government to check diversion of essential commodities. This exercise has never been undertaken and hence there is a complete failure on the part of the Government to reach at a correct estimation of BPL families in the State.
1.15 High exclusion error means a low coverage of BPL households. Large inclusion errors imply that the APL households receive an unacceptably large portion of subsidized grain.
1.16 The Supreme Court by order dated February 14th 2006 has now directed that the survey methodology for the next BPL census will be designed by the Ministry of Rural Development in consultation with the Supreme Court Commissioner’s in the Right to food matter Case No. 196/2001 along with other sections of the society latest by the beginning of the XIth Five Year Plan and that provision will be made to allow new names to be added and ineligible names deleted from the BPL List 2002 on a continuous basis during the period that the list will be applicable; This committee in its report has discussed the issues of identification in detail and its recommendations made there apply across the board to all states. The committee in essence has recommended that the need for proper identification is an urgent and necessary measure and requires time bound implementation.
1.17 It may also be pointed out that there has been a problem due to the nomenclature of the survey. The survey conducted for providing ration at subsidized rates should be called by a different name to avoid this confusion. A single BPL list does not appropriately represent various types of deprivations faced by the people. The objective of the MoRD is to identify the poor beneficiaries for its programmes and it can not become a universal list for delivering all programmes. The State Governments are therefore required to formulate separate guidelines for identifying beneficiaries. These guidelines should take into account the ground realities in the State.
2.1 Food grain is procured for the Public Distribution System on
behalf of the Central Government by the Food Corporation of India (FCI). State
2.2 Diversion of food grain takes place at every level of the system. The different ways in which diversion takes place would show that Government Officials, Storage Agents, Godown Keepers, Transporters and retailers are all involved in the diversion of food grain in some manner or the other. The malady of diversion is prevalent in the system in such large scale that it has become a menace and threat to the system.
2.3 The first and foremost reason for diversion is the difference in the price of TPDS grain and market rate. This serves as an incentive for the unscrupulous persons connected with the implementation of the system to connive with the traders to divert the TPDS food grain into open market. The difference in price is also an incentive for people who are not otherwise eligible under the scheme to get the benefit of the lesser rates of grain.
2.4 The second reason for diversion is the lack of any system of accounting for the grain allocated under the system. Ideally there should be a system by which the grain allocated to the State can be equated with the grain distributed to the beneficiaries. Since the scale of distribution and the number of beneficiaries is very large this can not be achieved manually. Thus there is need for complete automation and computerization of the Public Distribution System.
2.5 The third reason for diversion is that the functions of implementation, enforcement and vigilance are not clearly demarcated and implemented.
2.6 There are two ways in which diversion takes place. Firstly by selling the TPDS grain in the open market, and secondly by substituting the TPDS grain by grain of inferior quality.
2.7 The Targeted Public Distribution System when introduced was intended to benefit about 6 crore poor families for whom a quantity of about 72 lakh tones of food grains was earmarked annually. Over and above the TDPS allocation, additional allocation of 103 lakh tones of food grain was earmarked annually and provided to the States as ‘transitory allocation’. This was intended for continuation of benefit of subsidized food grains to the population Above Poverty Line (APL) as any sudden withdrawal of benefits existing under PDS from them was not considered desirable. The allocation for APL has continued till date and has proved to be one of the greatest sources of diversion. At present the allocation for the APL to any State is 14.6% of its APL requirement. It is common knowledge that most APL cardholders do not get any food grains under the PDS. Rest do not bother to draw their entitlement. Since full quota is not being allotted for the APL most of the States have adopted the ‘first come first serve’ principal. This enables the FPS dealer to put off any card holder on the plea that the APL stock has been exhausted and divert most of the stock meant for APL.
2.8 This Committee in its
2.9 In the State of
2.10 As already stated above private storage agents are the major
source of diversion in the State of
2.11 The retailers also indulge in diversion. APL food grain can be easily diverted by them as already shown above. They also use bogus ration cards for diversion. Besides this the committee received complaints showing that the FPS dealers retain the ration cards of the poor people and indulge in short weighing. As a matter of fact diversion at any stage has to be ultimately accounted for against some ration card. This makes the FPS licensee an accessory to all diversion done at any level and provides scope for him to indulge in diversion on his own.
2.12 The weighing systems at different levels also provide large scope for diversion. The Committee found that that at most places manual weighing scales of very small capacities are used.
2.13 There are provisions in the PDS Control Order, 2001 regarding quality Control. It is provided that the State Governments shall make arrangements for taking delivery of essential commodities issued by the Central Government by their designated agencies or nominees from the FCI.
2.14 Depots/godowns should ensure further delivery to the fair price shop within the first week of the month for which allocation is made. Before making the payment to the FCI the representatives of State Governments or their nominees and the FCI shall conduct joint inspection of the stocks of foodgrains intended for issue to ensure that the stocks conform to the prescribed quality specifications. The FCI shall issue to the State Governments stack-wise sealed samples of the stocks of foodgrains supplied to them for distribution under the Public Distribution System at the time of dispatch. State Governments shall exercise necessary checks to ensure that full quantity lifted by them reaches their godowns and in turn the fair price shops. State Governments shall ensure that stocks of essential commodities under the Public Distribution System, as issued from the FCI godowns, are not replaced by stocks of inferior quality during storage, transit or any other stage till delivery to the ration card holder.
2.15 The Committee found that there was no system of quality control in the state. No samples were found even at the whole sale distribution points. No samples were supplied to the retailers. There was no check on quality of grain being supplied to the beneficiaries. The Committee found insect infested grain at one of the Storage Agents in Orrissa and rotten grain lying in the godown of BSFC in Jharkhand.
2.16 It is suggested that there should be complete automation of weighing systems at all levels. Weigh Bridges should be used at all FCI and whole sale distribution points. These weigh Bridges should be connected to computer systems to generate weight check memos automatically. Stock inventories should also be automatically generated. The system of sampling should be strictly observed. The State Government has to obtain stack wise samples from the FCI after a joint inspection of the grain. The whole sail distribution point must issue samples to the retailers to show the quality of grain supplied. The retailer must display the sample at his FPS shop so that the quality can be checked by the officials, vigilance machinery, enforcement machinery and the consumer.
2.17 The committee also learnt that at every stage of storage and transportation some pilferage of food grain takes place from the jute bags. It was shown to the committee how easy it is to poke a jute bag to take out grain from it and then close the opening created by the poker. A jute bag received from the FCI was found to contain an average weight of 48.5 Kg against 50 Kg. The same bag then gets reduced to about 45-46 kg at the whole sale distribution point.
2.18 During the visit to
2.19 It is felt that in case TPDS food grain is packed in non pilferable, tamper proof bags of 10kg and 5 kg the same can be delivered to the beneficiary in sealed packing. This measure along with automation in weighing and use of computerization and smart cards would go a long way in eliminating or at least reducing pilferage. It would also ensure a more hygienic handling of food grain and help in ensuring that the food grain of proper quality reaches the beneficiary.
2.20 The Committee feels that diversion of PDS food grain can be largely curbed by use of information and communication technology (ICT) based solutions. Suggestions in this regard have been given in separate recommendations made by this Committee.
A. The distribution under the PDS in the State is being done through the Orrissa State Civil Supplies Corporation. The whole sale distribution of essential commodities is done through storage agents.
B. During the course of the visit of the Committee to the Office of the Corporation, a case relating to the district of Angul was noticed the applicant had been recommended by a Minister of the Sate Government. The District Collector and the Board of the Corporation did not recommend the name of the applicant. But the State Government appointed the said applicant as a storage agent. During the visit to Angul, the Committee obtained the file relating to this case. The matter had been referred to the Sub- Collector for verification after the orders from the State Government. The complaint was that wife of the applicant was a public representative and therefore, the applicant was ineligible for appointment. The applicant submitted an affidavit before the Sub-Collector that he has been divorced for the last five years and had been living separately from his wife. This affidavit was accepted by the Sub-Collector as sufficient proof of divorce.
C. This case is a glaring example of political interference in the implementation process of PDS.
D. The process of appointment of a retailer as per the guidelines of the State Government is that a retailer should be appointed for the population of 2000 in plain areas and one retailer should be appointed for the population of 1000 in hill and inaccessible areas. It is provided that marginal variation from the population may be made in case where fair price shops established on this basis would be inaccessible to some consumers to that outlet or the distance between the retail below and the village / hamlet is more than 2 Km.
E. As a general principle, the maximum number of retail centers to be opened in Gram Panchayat areas was not to exceed three, however, in inaccessible areas the number in a Gram Panchayat may be increased to a maximum of five.
F. The applicant desirous of obtaining retail license has to submit an application before the Sub-Collector and satisfy him that the applicant has adequate financial resources to run a retail fair price shop and has suitable premises for functioning of the retail shop. It has to be ensured that the location of the retail shop is convenient to the consumers. The financial viability of the applicant has to be examined with reference to the value of essential commodities that retailer would be required to lift in a month.
G. After the enquiry is conducted in the District or sub-divisional office by the SCSO or other designated officer the application is required to be put up before Block Level Advisory Committee (BLAC) or Taluk Level Advisory Committee (TLAC) for consideration.
H. The Block Level Advisory Committee (BLAC) or Taluk Level Advisory Committee (TLAC) makes a recommendation after passing a resolution. The appointment is then made by the concerned Sub- Collector / ADM. In case of Gram Panchayat / WSFG and Corporative, no recommendation of the Block Level Advisory Committee (BLAC) or Taluk Level Advisory Committee (TLAC) is required.
I. Committee observed that:-
1.There is rampant political interference in the selection of storage agents and retailers and all procedures are given a gobye by the department if there is a ‘political’ recommendation.
2. The Committee found there is no transparent mode of appointment of FPS dealers as no advertisement is issued whenever there is a vacancy.
3. The Taluk and Block level advisory committee would meet only when a ‘convenient’ application is received and what is worse is that only the ‘convenient’ application is considered and the previous applications are just ignored.
It may be
mentioned here that in the State of
K. It may be noticed that the PDS Control Order 2001, envisages the formulation of Vigilance Committees to perform the functions of keeping a vigil and for monitoring the working of the PDS at the State/ District / Block and FPS level. However, in the State or Orissa the Committees have been designated as Advisory Committees and perform an active role in the implementation of the PDS. The overlapping of functions ensures that these Committees are unable to perform vigilance which is the main purpose of these Committees. It was also revealed that these Committees rarely meet as required and only indulge in interference in the implementation of the system. A perusal of the files relating to the appointment of retail Licensees and enquiries from the officials revealed that Vigilance Committees do not meet regularly. Applications for license are received by the sub- collector and keep lying with him. Only when an application is received from a convenient person the meeting of the Vigilance Committee is convened. The only agenda for the meeting is to recommend the licensee. These Committees are not actually doing any vigilance work.
L. The State Food and Supplies department should frame/ amend the rules regarding allotment of licenses in order to re-define the role of the vigilance committees in allotment of licenses. Any vacancy for an FPS should be properly advertised. The applications received can be scrutinized by the officials to ensure that they comply with the eligibility conditions. Names of the applicants can be made public and objections invited from the public and bodies responsible for vigilance. Spot verification can be done by officials of the department. There can be a committee to take a final decision.
M. The State Government has introduced a system of distributing the food grains on fixed dates i.e. 5th, 6th, 7th, 20th,21st and 22nd day of every month. This system may be convenient for the State Government officials but causes many difficulties for the beneficiaries. It should not be forgotten that the Public Distribution System is for the benefit of the public and not for the convenience of the implementing authorities. There are long queues at every FPS on the distribution days. If some beneficiary who is daily wage earner comes to get his ration he has to forego his earnings for that day. The beneficiary is compelled to take his entire entitlement on one day. This system is clearly violating of the directions of the Supreme Court contained in the order dated May 2, 2003 in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 196 of 2001. The Supreme Court has directed that Licensees who do not keep their shops open throughout the month during the stipulated period shall make themselves liable for cancellation of their license. This order also provides that in order to facilitate the supply of grain the BPL house hold should be permitted to buy the ration in installments. Both these directions are thus being flouted because of the distribution of ration only on fixed dates.
IV. ALLOCATION AND DISTRIBUTION
1. Under the TPDS procurement of grain is to be done by FCI. However, in some states like Orrissa the Central Government has allowed Decentralised Procurement under the Decentralised Procurement Scheme. Under this scheme the State Government, on its own or through its agencies procures paddy in account of FCI. Allocation is done to the State from the grain purchased by them. If there is deficiency further allocation is done from the grain procured by FCI from other States. In case there is excess it is allocated to other States by the FCI.
2. Orrissa is having large cultivation of Paddy. After procuring Paddy the Government agencies give it to the Millers for extracting rice. The Millers return the rice to the State Government which is distributed through the Storage Agents.
3. As per the rules the Millers should not be related to the storage agents. In practice it was found that all the millers and storage agents belonged to one community and work in close co-ordination with each other. There were complaints that in fact the procurement was being done by the Millers on behalf of the OSCSC. Thus the officials of OSCSC, Millers and Storage Agents were all involved in diversion.
4. The State has adequate storage facilities. Orrissa State Civil Supplies Corporation owns 161 godowns in the State. The State Government has transferred 50 godowns to the Corporation. It has also hired several godowns from CWC, OSWC, RMC MARKFED and private persons. Besides this the Panchayat Raj Department owns 6000 godowns of 50 MT capacity and 300 godowns of 100MT capacity which they are prepared to put at the disposal of the Corporation. The Panchayat Raj Department and the Urban Development Department are also prepared to construct more godowns. However, it appears that the Corporation is not interested. It even lets out its godowns to storage agents.
5. The Committee strongly feels that the system of Storage Agents in the State is a major source of diversion and should be done away fourth with.
6. The Committee found that the Chairman of the Corporation was a political person. He would naturally be in a position to exercise influence in the functioning of the Corporation especially in the matters of appointment of Storage Agents. The Chairman in the meeting with the Committee also informed the Committee that he tours the State regularly. This would show that he was certainly in a position to exercise influence over the distribution system in the State.
7. The Committee is of the view that the Chairman of the Corporation should not be a political person. The earlier practice of having the Secretary of the Food and Supplies Department as the Chairman of the Corporation needs to be immediately restored.
V. VIABILITY, SCALE OF ISSUE AND PRICE
1. Since 1997, the Scale of issue of the BPL families has been gradually increased from 10 kg. to 35 kg. per family per month. The scale of issue was increased from 10 kg. to 20 kg. per family per month with effect from 1.4.2000. The allocation for APL families had been retained at the same level as at the time of introduction of TPDS (i.e. 10 kg. per family per month). The allocation of food grains for the BPL families has been further increased from 20 kg to 25 kg. per family per month with effect from July, 2001. Initially, the Antyodaya families were provided 25 kg. of food grains per family per month at the time of launching of the scheme. The scale of issue under APL, BPL and AAY has been revised to 35 kg per family per month with effect from 1.4.2002 with a view to enhancing the food security at the household level.
2. State of
3. The Committee was informed that at the initial stages this scheme worked well. However, this scheme has increased the demand for BPL cards. Extra BPL cards mean that the real beneficiary gets less than his entitlement and persons not entitled to the benefit are getting foodgrain at subsidized rates. The Committee was not apprised of any reason why the State took the decision to sell BPL rice at Rs. 2/- per Kg. However, the Committee was informed that the State would meet the expenditure from its own budget.
4. CENTRAL ISSUE PRICE (CIP) :- The present Central Issue Price (CIP) of food grains being supplied under TPDS is as under: -
(Figure in Rs. per kg.)
Commodity APL BPL AAY
Rice 8.30 5.65 3.00
Wheat 6.10 4.15 2.00
5. The Scale of issue and the issue price also raises the question of Viability of the Storage Agents and Retail Licensees.
6. The Storage Agents are paid remunerations for their services as per the Government approved rates per Quintal. i.e. Storage Commission Rs. 3.20 (BPL) and Rs. 1.60 (AAY), incidental charges Rs. 2.50, interest on investment Rs. 0.80 (BPL) and 0.40 (AAY) and Transportation charges Rs. 10/- upto 19 Km and Rs. 0.35 per Km. Beyond 10 Km. Prior to 1197-98 the Storage Agents were allowed to lift the essential commodities, without pre-deposit of cost but from 1997-98 the agents can lift the essential commodities only after prepayment as per the policy of the Corporation.
6. The case of Kailash Chandra Aggarwal of Talcher Block is a vivid example to justify the abolition of Storage Agents. At the time of visit by the Committee he first tried to project that he was running into losses but on being prompted by an official of the department accompanying the team members of the Committee, he changed his stances and provided calculations showing profits. This case is only an example to show that all is not well with the system of storage agents. The Committee is of the view that the system of private storage agents should be abolished and the State Government should take the responsibility of whole sale storage and distribution through its own departmental mechanism or through the OSCSC.
7. The calculations of profit margins of FPS shops in Salepur, District Cuttak and Bada Danda Sahi, Talcher in Angul District clearly show that that the shops are not viable entities. It is necessary that these shops have some additional income to make them viable. The commission of the retailers can only be increased by ensuring that they do not have to spend on transport and door step delivery is provided to them. It is also necessary that FPS shop keepers are also allowed to do business in other non PDS items of grocery as it is not possible to ask the Government to increase the subsidy nor it is desirable to increase the burden on the consumer by increasing the price of PDS grain.
8. Door step delivery of food grain has to be given to the FPS dealers both in urban and rural areas. This would not only in accordance with the scheme and provisions of the PDS Control Order, 2001 but eliminate the expenses incurred by the FPS dealer on transportation thus increasing the viability. It is suggested that the licenses for the FPS should be given to persons running grocery shops. This business of FPS can supplement their income as they will not have to incur additional overheads for acquiring a shop, electricity etc. It would also help to increase their customer base as more customers would be coming to their shops to get PDS grain. The experiment of Women Self Help Groups was found to working well. In case no such shop keeper is available in the area FPS may be given to WSHG. The Committee also found that mobile Vans were doing well in distribution of PDS grain in remote areas or where the license of an FPS is suspended or cancelled. The number of mobile vans should be increased for distribution.
9. When the Committee suggested to the FPS owners to sell other items of grocery from their shops to add to their income they showed disinclination. Reason is not far to seek. It is the diversion of PDS food grain by them. In fact ownership of the Kirana shop should be made a condition of the license.
The monitoring of the Targeted Public Distribution System can be divided into two parts
1. Awareness and availability of information is the key to vigilance. The PDS Control Order, 2001 provides that a copy of the allocation order made to the Fair Price Shop shall be simultaneously sent to the Nagar Palika, Gram Panchayat or the Vigilance Committees or any other body nominated for monitoring the functioning of the fair price shop. It further provides that the bodies nominated for monitoring the functioning of the FPS by the State Government shall display the stocks of essential commodities allotted during the months to the FPS on a notice board outside their office.
2. Vigilance under the TPDS is envisaged through the Vigilance Committees, Gram Panchayats, Nagar Palikas, and the Consumer.
3. The provisions regarding Vigilance Committees have been ignored if not flouted by the State Government. Either the Vigilance Committees envisaged under the PDS Control Order, 2001 have not been formed or they have not been meeting and performing their duties. This is because there is no accountability for any one to ensure that the meetings of the Vigilance Committees take place regularly. The PDS Control Order, 2001 provides that the meetings of the Vigilance Committees on Public Distribution System at the State, District, Block and FPS level shall be held on a regular basis. The date and periodicity has to be notified by the State Governments. However, the periodicity has to be not less than one meeting a quarter at all levels.
4. The State Government is therefore duty bound to ensure that meetings of the Vigilance Committees at all levels take place at least once in three months. However, no authority has been made responsible for ensuring that such meetings take place. It has also been seen that most of the Vigilance Committees formed by the State Government are too large and unwieldy. The State Government should fix the responsibly of the officials of the administrative machinery to convene the meetings and ensure the presence of the members. Rules can provide that any member who does not attend two consecutive meetings would be replaced. The Secretary of the Department of Food and Supply should be responsible for convening the meetings at the State level, the District Magistrate should be responsible for the District level Committee, Block Development Officer should be responsible for the block and FPS level committees.
5. The PDS Control Order, 2001 also requires the State Governments to make rules regarding furnishing of copies of the specified documents, namely ration card register, stock register, and sale register. Any ration card holder desirous of obtaining extracts from the records of the FPS owner can make a written request to such owner along with the fee specified by the State Government and the FPS owner has to supply the copies of the record within fourteen days from date of receipt of the request.
6. The right to information thus provided under the PDS Control Order, 2001 has been negated by the States by not making rules regarding the fees payable for obtaining the copies. Such rules should be made immediately and wide publicity given to educate the beneficiary.
7. The Panchayat Raj Institutions and the Nagar Palikas should be actively involved in the vigilance. The elected representatives of the people must perform their duty in keeping a vigil on the activities connected with the Public Distribution System.
8. The purpose of providing that the copies of the allocation order for each FPS shop should also be sent to the Gram Panchayat or Nagar Palika and should be displayed on their notice board is to prompt their members to be vigilant and check the activities of the FPS licensees.
9. As already stated earlier, the involvement of political persons in the implementation of the scheme should be strictly avoided and they should play a greater role in vigilance. In case the political persons are involved in the implementation process it becomes difficult to take any action against the defaulting license.
10. The involvement of the political persons in the process of implementation minimizes and negates the provisions regarding vigilance by the Panchayats, Nagar Palikas or the Vigilance Committees.
11. Another aspect of the Vigilance mechanism is the complaint system. In Orrissa a helpline has been set up but the complainant has no way to find out if any action has been taken on his complaint. It is necessary that there should be 24 hour dedicated helpline set up in the state so that any one can lodge a complaint against any the person involved in the implementation of the Public Distribution System.
12. There should be a machinery to verify the complaints and take action against the guilty. The complainant should be able to follow up his complaint. The identity of the complainant should be protected. The committee has also recommended the setting up of an independent watchdog in the form of a regulator/ombudsman to oversee the smooth functioning of the system.
1. The enforcement under the Public Distribution System is dismal and ineffective. This is the reason for the improper implementation of the system and large extent of diversion. No system can succeed if there is no fear of punishment.
2. The Committee found that the States did not have any enforcement mechanism. Any vigilance set up can not succeed without a proper enforcement mechanism. Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 provides punishment for violations of the Control Orders issued under Section 3 of the Act. These provisions are technical in nature and require specially trained personnel to enforce them. The normal police have proved ineffective in enforcing these provisions.
3. It has also been observed that the cases filed under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 keep on pending in courts indefinitely and a large majority of cases end up in acquittal of the accused persons. It is necessary that special courts and specially trained prosecutors are appointed for the trial of these cases.
4. The license granted to the dealers lay down certain conditions. The violation of these conditions makes the licensee liable for cancellation of his license. The Supreme Court has also ordered that licensees
· who do not keep their shops open throughout the month during the stipulated period,
· fail to provide grain to BPL families strictly at BPL rates,
· keep the cards of BPL households with them,
· make false entries in the BPL cards,
· engage in black-marketing or siphoning away of grains to the open market, and
· hand over such ration shops to other person/organizations,
will make himself liable for cancellation of his license.
5. This order was passed on 2.5.2003 but no action has been taken by the State to enforce this order. It is therefore necessary that the special squads consist of persons drawn from the administration and the police and should be placed directly under the District Magistrate. These squads should be responsible for conducting raids, launching criminal prosecutions and also for recommending departmental action for suspension or cancellation of license, or imposing penalties No action appears to have been taken against any official though it is can not be denied that no diversion of food grain is possible without the connivance of the officials of the department. . It is also important that these squads should have the powers to recommend action against officials in whose jurisdiction violations are detected or who are found to be involved in diversion of food grain. The Committee feels that there should be dedicated Special squads in every District for enforcement of the penal provisions of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. The Committee has suggested Zero Tolerance in the matter of enforcement in the Public Distribution System. Similarly a special squad should also be created at the State level for surprise checks whenever there is complaint requiring such action.
6. It must not be lost sight of that the Public Distribution System is meant to provide food security to the poor people of the country and diversion of food grain can not be tolerated.
The State of Orissa, which is situated in eastern India is bounded by the State of Jharkhand on the north, by the State of West Bengal on the north east, by the Bay of Bengal on the east, by the State of Andhra Pradesh on the south and by the State of Chhattisgarh on the west.
The majority of Orissa’s population i.e. almost 85% is rural and the balance 15% is urban. Orissa is divided into 30 Districts and 6234 Gram Panchayats.
The M.S. Swaminathan Foundation Report on Food Insecurity Atlas of Rural India has classified Orissa as one of the 4 severely food insecure States, the others being Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh and Chhattisgarh. According to the Report by World Bank titled “Orissa in transition: from fiscal turnaround to rapid and inclusive growth” 45% of Orissa’s population still remains mired in poverty.
It is stated that Orissa has been periodically
exposed to starvation deaths. The State has a high proportion of tribal
population and has palpably low literacy rates. In terms of percentage of lives lost to total lives lost in two years as per data in the
year 2001, Orissa dominates with 62.3%. In
terms of number of persons per thousand with zero meals per day, in the lower
expenditure groups the national average is 20 %. Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Karnataka,
The UNFP Food Insecurity Atlas of Orissa suggests
that Orissa is the worst state in terms of poverty. The districts of Phulbani Boudh Koraput,
Kalahandi, Dhenkanal, Bolangir, Keonjhar, Mayurbhanj and Sundergarh are the
worst hit by poverty. More than 65% of rural households live below the poverty
line. Among the states, Orissa has the
highest incidence of poverty that is 31 % higher than the all
The Orissa Human Development Report says that one of the most significant factors in food insecurity is access to the Public Distribution System (PDS) and its limited utilization by the poor. The Report also points out that although the availability of food is fairly comfortable yet food insecurity is chronic.
Keeping in mind these various reports as mentioned
above the Committee decided to visit the State of
LEGAL REGIME GOVERNING THE PUBLIC DISTRIUBTION SYSTEM IN ORISSA
I. ENTITIES INVOLVED IN THE SUPPLY OF FOOD GRAINS TO CONSUMERS:-
There is clear division of responsibility for TPDS
for the Central Government and the State/Union Territory Governments. Central Government is responsible for
procurement, storage, transportation upto principal centers of FCI, allocation
to State and
For the purpose of distribution, State/UT Governments have constituted separate Corporations which are Government Companies under the Companies Act 1956.
The Committee during its visit to Orissa from
Food Corporation of
1.2 Department of Food Supplies and Consumer Welfare, Government of Orissa.
The Committee during its visit was informed that the main functions of the Food Supplies and Consumer Welfare Department are :-
i) Formulation and implementation of policy relating to procurement, storage and distribution of food grains.
ii) Implementation of the Targeted Public Distribution System (TPDS).
iii) Administration of Essential Commodities Act, 1955; prevention of Black Marketing and Maintenance of Services of Essential Commodities Act 1980; various Control Orders of Central Government and State Government .
iv) Procurement of Paddy.
v) Collection of information and monitoring of prices of various essential commodities in the market ; and
vi) Implementation and enforcement of Standards of Weights and Measures Act and Standards of Weights and Measures (Enforcement) Act and Rules made there under.
The Committee found out that the Department of Food Supplies & Consumer Welfare (FS&CW) was engaging in overall supervision as with the existence of Orissa State Civil Supplies Corporation (OSCSC) since 1980, the detailed distribution of PDS was taken over from the Department of FS&CW by the OSCSC.
1.3.1 The Orissa State Civil Supplies Corporation (hereinafter ‘OSCSC) is a fully owned Government undertaking incorporated as a Government Company under the Companies Act 1956 on 3rd September, 1980.
1.3.2 In alignment with the food policy of the then State Government, OSCSC has been established to take over from the FS &CW Department, Government of Orissa the Public Distribution System in the State. The loss incurred by the Corporation after taking into account revenues generated and expenses incurred is being borne by the State Government by way of subsidy.
1.3.3 The Committee examined the Profit & Loss accounts/Income & Expenditure & Balance Sheet of OSCSC for the past three financial years: 2005-2006, 2006-2007 & 2007-2008 and found that the Corporation runs on huge subsidy from the State Government and still the Corporation had been running in losses.
1.3.4 OSCSC as per its Memorandum of Association engages either on its own or through any other firm, company corporation or Institution for promoting, improving, development, counseling or financing production, purchase, storage, processing, movement, transport, distribution and sale of food grains, food stuffs, sugar and other essential commodities and to provide assistance, advise and services connection thereto.
1.3.5 Thus consequent upon the incorporation of OSCSC, the commercial activity and functioning of the FS&CS Department has been taken over by the OSCSC.
1.3.6 The Committee during its visit to the State found out that the Chairman of OSCSC was a member of a political party. He not only presides over the board meetings but also plays a supervisory & critical role in major decisions of the Corporation. Under the law, a chairman of company/corporation is supposed to preside over the annual general meeting of the company/corporation and the Board of Directors meeting.
(OSCSC has a Managing Director who is presently a senior officer of State Administrative Service.)
1.3.7 OSCSC has also been engaged in procurement of rice under the decentralized procurement scheme adopted by the State. The OSCSC also appoints storage agents. The storage agents are the penultimate link in the distribution chain. They collect and transport the stock from the allotted FCI Godowns and food supply depots (FSD) of the Corporation and store in their concerned Block and Municipal Depots of the Districts. A detailed analysis of the role of storage agents is dealt with in a separate chapter on the subject.
1.4 Fair Price Shops & Mobile Vans:
In the State there are 29,443 retail outlets or Fair Price Shops operating out of which of 4382 are in urban areas and 25061 in rural. They are being run either by private persons or self help groups or gram panchayats, or as cooperatives or being run as model fair price shops called Maitris. A detailed analysis on this aspect is given subsequently in this report. Apart from this there are mobile vans operated by the OSCSC which also distribute PDS food grains.
Model Fair Price Shops (Maitree)- Model fair price shops (herein after called MFPS) are opened in different urban areas of the state to make availability of essential commodities at reasonable price to consumers. One SA cum GA and one kantawalla mans each shop. Each shop has been tagged with ration cards in the scale of 1500-2000 so that these shops are made economically viable to the consumers. At present 40 such shops are run by the Corporation. It would appear that during market intervention, in the event of price hike of any commodity, these MFPS called “MAITREE” play a significant role.
II. Broad Description Of Channels Involved In The Public Distribution System
2.1 The Food supplies and consumer welfare Department allots on monthly basis PDS commodities to every district as per the card position.
2.2 On receipt of the allotment, the Collector of the district distributes the same to all Blocks and Municipalities.
2.3 On receipt of Block-wise and Municipality–wise allocation of PDS commodities, the district manager, OSCSC makes financial arrangement with FCI towards cost of commodities and obtains release orders to lift the stocks from the base depots of FCI.
2.4 Thereafter, the District Supply Officer who is ex-officio District Manager, OSCSC allocates the commodities to the storage agents to lift the stocks from Food Supply Depots (FSD) / FCI.
2.5 The storage agents deposit the prepaid cost of PDS commodities at government fixed price with the District Manager, OSCSC and obtain delivery order from the District Manager, OSCSC to lift the stocks from the allotted FSD/FCI.
2.5.1 The Assistant Civil Supplies Officer (A.C.S.O) is kept in charge of F.S.D. point to effect delivery of stock to storage agents.
2.6 The storage agents are required to transport the stocks and store in their godowns situated at concerned blocks and Municipality depots of the Districts.
2.7 The Block level and Municipality issuing officers distribute stocks on receipt of allotment from the Collector to the retailers according to the ration card strengths tagged to each retail centre.
2.8 The Inspector of Supplies / Marketing Inspectors endorse the quantity in the tally registers of retailers to enable lifting of food stuffs from storage agents on payment of cost of commodities with the storage agents.
2.8.1 The retailers after lifting of commodities, issue stocks to the consumers on production of cards tagged to them as per the price fixed by the Government. In so far as the channel of distribution is concerned the finding of the Committee as discernible hereinafter reveals that in order to ensure smooth, timely and efficient disbursal of stocks to the target population much requires to be done.
III BROAD OVERVIEW OF THE STATUTORY REGIME
The statutory framework governing and regulating different aspects of the Public Distribution System is contained in the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, PDS (Control) Order 2001 as amended in 2004, the Orissa Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2008 as notified on 13.3.2008 and various Government Orders and circulars issued from time to time by the Department of Food Supplies and Consumer Welfare, Government of Orissa on aspects of PDS. A brief summary of the Orissa Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2008 and other relevant instructions/orders are set out hereunder:-
3.1 The Orissa Public Distribution System(Control) Order 2008.
The Orissa Public Distribution System
(Control) Order, 2008 came into effect on
The Orissa Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2008 has replaced the Orissa Public Distribution System (Control) Order.2002.
a. Obtaining of a licence for a dealer under the order is a pre-requisite. (Clause 3). However this does not apply to the dealerships directly operated by the OSCSC.
While separate license is required for each place of business, in case of ‘Gram Panchayats’, they are not required to obtain separate license for opening sub-centers for sale within the Gram Panchayat area. [Clause 3(2)]
b. Clause 4 provides for appointment of dealers and grant of license.
The Government is to prescribe procedure for appointment of dealers. [Clause 4(1)]
First preference for appointment and for grant of license as retailer shall be given to Gram Panchayats followed by women- self help groups Cooperative Societies and other self - help groups in that order of preference. [4(3)]
Sub-clause (5) states that the renewal of license to persons other than those mentioned in the sub-section (3) & (4) shall not be granted.
c. The Committee during its visit to the State found that the appointment of Retailers was a mechanical exercise. No advertisement is issued regarding the vacancies. Names are recommended by the Block Level Advisory Committee/Taluk Level Advisory Committee & the Sub-Collector on their recommendation issues the license. The Committee also found that the Gram Panchayat running the shop may not be the most efficient thing.
d. No dealer shall hold a license under the Act if he or his family members have a commercial interest in a business or are commercial users of the said commodity or a commodity closely related to the said commodity or is a member of any Advisory or Vigilance Committee or any other Committee entrusted with supervision of the Public Distribution System. (Clause 5) (The penalty for violation is cancellation of the License & forfeiture of security deposit. The offender can be asked to surrender the license within three months.)
e. While Clause 6 provides for issue of license and renewal of license, Clause 7 provides that the duration of the license shall be on yearly basis and can be further renewed. A provision exists for the fees chargeable from wholesaler and Retailer for issue of license/ renewal of license. [(Clause 7(2)]. While Clause 8 makes the provision also for deposit of security deposit.
f. Then there are grounds for the licensing authority to refuse renewal on different grounds. In case performance is not satisfactory or there is contravention of any provisions of the Act, Order or the terms for grant of license or the license has a commercial interest detrimental to the functioning of PDS or the expected size of operations of the dealer is not economically viable or the renewal will not be in the interest of efficient functioning of PDS. [Clause 9(a)]. Sub-clause 2 provides for refusal or grant of license to a private dealer in case other categories under sub-clause 3 (Women self help group etc.) are available. There are exhaustive check list of responsibilities and duties of the FPS licensees. (Clauses 10-16).
g. While Clause 21 read with Clause 2(j) provides for identification of BPL, AAY & Annapurna beneficiaries in accordance with the State Government guidelines.
h. Clause 22 of the Control Order provides the statutory basis for issue of Ration Card. The Clause spells out the broad basis for issue of Ration Card. Sub-clause (c) of the said clause 22 prohibits duplication, misrepresentation or tempering. Sub-clause (g) provides that normally a ration card shall be valid for five years after which it can be renewed.
i. Clause 23 gives power for entry, search & seizure to the licensing authority or authority with delegated powers.
IV. GOVERNMENT INSTRUCTIONS ON ISSUANCE OF RATION CARDS
4.1 Guidelines governing the issuance of Ration Cards.
Instruction No. 35124(27) F&CS dated
4.2 Instructions regarding selection of beneficiaries under the Antyodaya Anna Yojana (AAY).
Instruction No. /PL III 16/2000/1345 dated 12.01.2001 contains instructions on selecting beneficiaries under the Antyodaya Anna Yojana (AAY). It provides that under the Scheme 5,05,000 number of poorest of poor families will be supplied foodgrains under the Scheme. Para 3.4 of the Government instructions states that only landless labourers who figure in the BPL list of 1997 survey will be considered under the AAY scheme. Households with woman head and families having handicapped members shall be given preference. Family having pucca house, a luna, motor cycle of any power driver vehicle will be excluded. Families having Government servant and Government undertaking employees shall be excluded. Families who have been beneficiaries under the Indira Awas Yojana will be excluded. Persons covered under National Old Age Pension (NOAP) & State Old Age Pension (SOAP) schemes and under Annapurna Scheme shall be excluded.
One of the problems in the State of
4.3 Criteria for eligibility for selection under the expanded AAY.
The Instruction No. 22152/FSCW/PL-III-PD 6/2005 dated 7.10.2005 contains eligibility criteria for selection of family under expanded AAY. Clause 2 provides a list of persons who will be considered as falling under the AAY category. Besides the landless labourers, widows, it contains an exhaustive list such as potters, snake charmers, rag pickers, destitute, terminally ill persons, persons over 60 years of age, single woman or single men with no means of subsistence and primitive tribal households.
4.4 The Rs. 2 per kg rice scheme
The State of
WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTION MECHANISM
This Chapter deals with the process of
wholesale distribution of PDS grain in the State of
The study of the OSCSC and the storage agents appointed by it has to be understood in the background of the fact that the State admittedly has more than 6000 godowns of its own and inspite of that fact the concept of storage agents has been devised and storage of PDS grain has been sub contracted to private individuals at the intermediary stage of distribution.
a. The Orissa State Civil Supplies Corporation (hereinafter ‘OSCSC’ or ‘Corporation’) is fully owned Government undertaking incorporated as Government Company under the Companies Act 1956 on 3rd September, 1980. In alignment with the food policy of the then State Government, OSCSC has been established to take over from the FS &CW Department, Government of Orissa the Public Distribution System in the State.
b. The OSCSC Ltd. functions as an authorised agency of State Government and ensures availability of adequate quantities of essential commodities to the entitled consumers.
c. The loss incurred by the Corporation after taking into account revenues generated and expenses incurred is being borne by the State Government by way of subsidy.
The Objectives of the OSCSC as stated in its Memorandum of Association are as follows:-
1.1 Main Objectives
a. OSCSC engages either on its own or as the agent of Government of Orissa or any other firm, company Corporation or Institution for promoting, improving, development, counselling or financing production, purchase, storage processing movement, transport, distribution and sale of food grains, food stuffs, sugar and other essential commodities.
b. To provide assistance, advice and services, therefore, including capital credit, means, resources, technical and managerial services.
1.2 Ancillary and Other Objectives
a. To take over from the Government of Orissa any of its projects or services that have been established in connection with any activity or enterprise relating to Civil Supplies and with objectives of this Company in view.
b. To enter into any arrangements with the Government of India and Orissa or any other State Government, Company or Corporation or local authority for the purpose of carrying out the objects of company or furthering, its interest.
c. To act as agent for Government or other authorities or any manufactures, merchants and others and to transact and to carry on agency business of every kind and of any description relating to the purpose of the Company.
d. Thus consequent upon the incorporation of OSCSC, the commercial activity and functioning of the FS&CS Department has been taken over by OSCSC.
e. The OSCSC also appoints storage agents. The storage agents are the penultimate links in the distribution chain. They collect and transport the stock from the allotted food Supply depots (FSD) and store in their concerned Block and Municipal Depots of the Districts.
a. The Corporation is managed by the Board of Directors consisting of Senior Government officials and non-official Director as Chairman.
Following are presently the Board of Directors as nominated by the government
· Chairman at present non official director.
· Commissioner cum secretary, F.S and C. W Department.
· Commissioner cum secretary, agricultural department.
· Managing director OSCSC.
· Registrar of Co-operative societies, Orissa.
· Additional Secretary, Finance Department.
· Additional secretary, P.E Department.
· Financial Advisor (F.A) and Chief Accounts Officer (C.A.O), OSCSC.
b. Managing Director is the Chief Executive of the Corporation. The Board of Directors is the authority of the Corporation to decide matters on the management and administration of the Corporation subject to the directions and the policy of the government.
c. Legal Provisions Regarding Appointment Of Chairman, His Powers And Duties
1. Section 175 of the Companies Act provides that the members can elect one of themselves to be Chairman of the meeting. However, the Articles can provide ‘otherwise’ & may permit a non-member to be the Chairman. It has been noted by the author A.Ramaiya that since the Chairman presides at every general meeting of the Company, appointing a person who is not a member as Chairman of the meeting can lead to an absurd result.
2. Article 87 of the Article of Association, OSCSC states that the Chairman of the Board shall be nominated by the Governor from amongst the Directors.
3. Article 85 of the Article of Association OSCSC, states that the Governor shall determine from time to time number of Directors. Article 86 says that Governor shall also have the right to nominate the Directors.
4. The Article of Association, OSCSC does not prescribe any qualification for being a Director of OSCSC.
5. As per Table A of the Companies Act, Chairman seem to have the power to adjourn meetings, to demand a pool, to rule on the validity of votes at general meetings & to rule on the validity of an amendment;
- Article 50 of Table A to the Act stipulates that the Chairman, if any, of the Board shall preside as Chairman at every general meeting of the company.
- Under Article 54 of Table A, the Chairman has a “ second or casting vote’ in the case of equality of votes.
- Under Section 178, a declaration by the Chairman whether a resolution has or has not been carried out or that it has been carried either unanimously or by a particular majority shall be conclusive.
6. The Committee found that the Chairman of OSCSC actively participates in the functioning of OSCSC in the administrative side. He also extensively tours the State on regular basis and claims TA/DA.
7. The Committee found that the Chairman, OSCSC is a political person. Earlier Secretary of the Department used to be the Chairman of the OSCSC. It was only some time in 2002 / 2003 that a political person was appointed as Chairman. There are no rules, regulations or instructions for appointment of Chairman. The Committee learnt present incumbent was appointed for first time simply on the basis of note received by the Corporation from the Chief Minister. At the time of General Election he had to leave the job like any other Chairman of other State Corporations. Since 2006, he has again taken over as Chairman. In between, the Secretary was the Chairman.
1.4 The Staffing Pattern at District Office of OSCSC was :-
Officer (Government Officer working as District Manager)
Assistant Manager (Accts)
Sr. Accts- Supervisor
(On Deputation from Government)
Senior Sales Manager-cum-Godown Supervisor
Sales Assistant cum Godown Assistant
Data Entry Operator
Class – IV
1.5 Current position of the Staff in OSCSC office was as followed :-
Category of Post
Men in Position
Officer ( 8 officers on deputation from Govt. Working at Head Office)
Senior Sales Manager-cum-Godown Supervisor
Data Entry Operator
Class – IV
1214 (Corporation Staff 807 and Outsourced 407)
1.6 Position of the Godowns under the control of Corporation :-
No. Of Godown
Capacity (In M.T.)
Corporation own godown
Godown transferred from Govt. in FS&CW Deptt.
Godown hired from other Government Agencies like CWC, OSWC, RMC, MARKFED, G.P. etc.
Godown hired from private persons
1.7 Different activities performed by the OSCSC are :-
1. Lifting, Storage and distribution of food grains under PDS
2. Decentralized procurement operation
3. Mobile maitree shop(mobile van scheme)
4. Model fair price shops (maitree)
5. Gas agencies
6. Relief operation
7. Market intervention
8. Consumer awareness
II. STORAGE AGENT
Orissa Control Order, 2008 defines a Storage Agent in 2 (Q) in the following manner:-
“Storage Agent means an agent appointed by the Orissa State Civil Supplies Corporation for transportation and/or storage of PDS commodities for and on behalf of the said corporation for their eventual distribution through the Public Distribution System.”
Clause 11 of the Control Order provides for the responsibilities and duties of such wholesale agents and Storage agents which are as follows:-
(1) The Wholesalers, including Sub-Wholesalers and Storage Agents Shall be responsible to :-
(a) Keep the essential commodities meant for PDS after obtaining the same from the authorized/nominated agency in the month preecing to the month to which the allotment relates ;
(b) Supply the Public Distribution System commodities to the retailer or Sub-Wholesaler as the case may be, immediately on demand and subject to prepayment of cost of commodities and production of tally register etc. as per prescribed procedures;
(c) Maintain register/records as prescribed by the Government/Licensing Authority from time to time;
(d) Produce such records, and information as called for by the authorized inspecting officers;
(e) Keep certified weights and measures as may be prescribed by Government and/ or Licensing Authority;
(f) Display the following information on a notice board at a prominent place outside the business premises near the entrance of the premises; namely :
(i) Timing of the Shop;
(ii) Opening Stock, quantity received, sold, closing stock, on a daily basis;
(iii) Issue price of each (commodity); and
(iv) License number/name of owner.
(g) Maintain books of accounts in the manner prescribed by State Government/Licensing authority and provide these to authorized officers for inspection and verification on demand;
(h) Provide correct cash memo in sequential order and, in case of foodgrains, printed copy of weighments slip to the cutomer;
(i) Display samples of foodgrians in stock kept for sale;
(j) Provide relevant extracts of records to any person on payment of prescribed fees;
(k) Arrange for scientific storage of Public Distribution System commodities; and
(l) Ensure that the agents and employees comply with all terms and conditions of the license and provisions of this order.
(2) The Wholesaler, including Sub-Wholesalers and Storage Agents shall not :
(a) Close the business premises during the business hours on working days without obtaining prior written permission of the licensing authority or an officer authorized by the licensing authority or by Government;
(b) Deliver Public Distribution System commodities to any person other than that a licensee for whom the commodities are meant to be supplied;
(c) Stock/Store the Public Distribution System commodities at any place other than the place allowed in the license;
(d) Retain the tally register of other licensees with him ; and
(e) Keep the records relating to the business at any place other than the licensed business premises.
It is relevant to point out that the Orissa Control Order does not provide the method for appointment of such Storage Agents. The Storage Agents are appointed by the OSCSC. The Committee on visits to these godowns, which fact will be elaborated little later in this report, found a total and blatant non adherence by Storage Agents to the duties and responsibilities enumerated in the Clause 11 of Orissa Control Order.
2.1 Appointment of Storage Agents
The OSCSC appoints various private individuals as Storage Agents for intermediary storage of PDS grain. As explained to the Committee, the process involved in the appointment of Storage Agents is as follows-
· Publication of advertisement in local dailies and selling of application form at the office of District Manager, OSCSC.
· Applications are filed before the collector.
· Verification of application/antecedents of applicants and sending the list of eligible candidates by the Collectors in prescribed proforma along with recommendation.
· Recommendations made by a public representative.
· A Committee is constituted which examines the recommendations.
· Once examined the report is put in front of the Board of Directors of the corporation.
· Food and Civil Supplies Department then examines the list of Storage Agent to be appointed.
· The list must be examined by a cabinet minister or a concerned minister of Food and Civil Supplies Department.
· Approval of selection list by the State Government.
· Then the Corporation issues the list to the concerned Collectors.
· Thereafter, the Collector makes the necessary enquiries if there are any complaints against the applicant.
· Thereafter, the Collector executes the agreement with the storage agent.
2.1(a) There Shall be one Storage Agent for a population of 50,000/- and fraction thereof in a Block/Urban Local Body (ULB) as the case may be. Additional storage agent shall be appointed for population exceeding 75,000. In case of inaccessible area with geographical barriers, the population criteria should be reduced to 35,000/-. Specific recommendation to that effect shall be made by the concerned Collector. In DPAP/ITDP block, the population size would be 35,000/- or part thereof for an agency. Additional storage agent shall be appointed for the population exceeding 52,500. In case of small ULBs with less than 35,000 population, population of neighboring block should be clubbed to form a unit of 50,000/35,000 as applicable for the block.
2.2 The Corporation appoints Storage Agents in each Block and Municipality of the State for transportation, Storage and distribution of essential commodities for about 30,000 retail fair price shops. They are paid remuneration for their services as per the Government approved rates i.e. Storage Commission Rs. 3.20/- per qtl (BPL) & Rs. 1.60/- per qtl (AAY), incidental charges Rs. 2.50/-, interest on investment, towards transport charges Rs. 10/- upto 10 Km & Rs. 0.35/- per Km/quintal beyond 10 Km. Prior to 1997-98 the Storage Agents were allowed to lift the essential commodities, without pre-deposit of cost but from 1997-98 the agents could lift the essential commodities only after prepayment as per the policy of the Corporation.
2.3 The Committee during its visit found that the appointment of Storage Agent was susceptible to high political influence. The Committee obtained the particulars of the applicants who applied for storage agency for the year 2007-2008 of the District Angul. The Committee while perusing the files observed a case of a storage agent named Mr. Bijay Kumar Sahoo whose appointment was approved despite a complaint having been lodged against him.
2.4 Particulars of the case are as followed:-
District - Angul
Block - Kishorenagar
Name of applicant - Mr Bijay Kumar Sahoo
Address of the applicant - Nunukapasi,
Financial solvency of the applicant- 15,00,000
Recommendation by the collector - No
Recommendation by a minister - Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Sahoo
Complainant against the applicant - Mr. Santanu Pradhan
Nature of Complaint - Applicants wife was the Chairman of K. Nagar block
Details of the case explained step by step-
1. An advertisement is given in the local newspapers.
2. Mr Bijay Kumar Sahoo (applicant) applies before the Collector. The Collector does not find him to be a suitable candidate for the appointment of storage agent since in a complaint filed against his name stated that his wife was the Chairman of the Kishorenagar block at the time of the filing of the application.
3. A Committee is constituted at the corporation level that scrutinizes the recommendations of the Collector or the public representative as per the guide lines and submits a report. The Committee also does not find him to be a suitable candidate.
4. A report is further put in front of the Board of Directors who also do not recommend his name to the government for the appointment of storage agent.
5. The government however approves his name, presumably at the intervention of the minister for the appointment as a storage agent and sends the order back to the Board of Directors
6. The Corporation then sends the file back to the district collector to make final enquiries and verification
7. The District Collector after making the necessary enquiries and verification approves Mr Bijay Kr Sahoo’s name for the appointment as a storage agent. The District Collector states that an enquiry had been conducted by the sub collector. Vide letter dated 4/11/2008 to the district collector it was informed that an affidavit had been submitted by Mr Bijay Kr Sahoo in which he had sworn that he had been divorced from his wife Mrs. Gauri Sahoo for the last five years and they had been living separately since then .
8. The District Collector further sends a letter to the Managing Director of the Corporation in which he asks the managing director to issue clearance in the case of Mr Bijay Kr Sahoo at the earliest.
2.5 This case was the astonishing example showing the political influence on the appointment of Storage Agents as just on the basis of an Affidavit submitted by the Storage Agent, the Collector agrees that applicant is divorced from his wife and does not think even for once that a court decree would be an essential document in proving the genuineness of the divorce.
2.6 Visits to Godowns of the OSCSC and Storage Agents
The Committee visited some godowns of the OSCSC and godowns operated by Storage Agents.
A. OSCSC Godowns
1. Visit to the OSCSC Godown. A-101 Mancheshwar, Bhubaneshwar:-
(i) On visiting the Godown owned by the Corporation, the following observations were made by the Committee-
· Electronic weighing machine at the Godown had only a capacity of 3 quintals.
· Facilities of repacking were not there at the Godown.
· Over 4200 empty bags were lying in the godown. The godown in charge said that these were the empty gunny bags which were in a bad condition and could not have been used to store food grains. The Commission then enquired from the godown Officials as to how did the 4200 empty gunny bags reach there. The Committee was then informed that the godown had received 2 rakes of food grains out of which the 4200 empty bags were damaged and had to be replaced.
· There were two sheds to store food grains.
· The first shed contained only levy sugar and the second shed contained PDS stock.
· Position of stock in the second shed was as followed :-
Under Decentralized procurement scheme (DPS)- 780.90 quintal
APL Rice – 9.79 quintal (retailer)
· This godown is used for storing whole sale as well as retailer quota.
· Samples of food grains were stated to be issued by the miller to the godown but not issued to the Storage agent by the godown incharge.
· No sampling of grains was kept by godown incharge of the food grains received through millers. This happened because samples of food grains received from millers are kept by the FCI officials.
· A computer was placed in the godowns managerial office but not used by the godown employees for storing any data.
· Assessment of godown was done by FCI on the basis of infrastructure and cleanliness.
· The godown in charge informed the Committee that he had never received any bad quality food grains.
· Stock register was maintained at the godown.
· Moisture check and quality check of food grains received through millers was done by a FCI official.
· No records maintained when food grains were rejected on the basis of bad quality.
(ii) The Committee found that:-
· This Godown is handling very large quantities of grain but had no weigh bridge. It only has a weighing machine which can weigh only 3 quintals at a time. Apparently no weighments are done and grain is received and distributed only by counting the bags irrespective of the quantity in each bag.
· It will be relevant to point out that at this stage the Committee found that bags of rice which were supplied to the storage agent did not contain full quantity of 50 kgs. On an average a bag contained 2-3kgs less rice. Storage agent receive food grains after proper weighment. However they distribute the food grain to the FPS Shops on the basis of number of bags presuming one bag to be of 50 kg. Thus for every 100 quintals the storage agent received 15 to 20 extra bags which ultimately remains with them. Consumers were not being supplied rice by weighing. They were told that less quantity are being received in every bag, therefore either 2 consumers were given 1 bag or 1 consumer was given a bag for two months quota. Since each consumer was suppose to get 25 kgs every month, he was only getting proportionately less quantities.
· The Godown was divided into two parts by a thin wall of bricks. The first part of the Godown was used by the OSCSC for storage of grains procured either through DPS or from FCI and the Second part of the Godown was leased out to the Storage Agent by the OSCSC for storing his grains.
· There are 83 FPS shops attached to the first part of the Godown belonging to OSCSC.
· Mr. Chakrodhar Barik was the Godown Superintendent and was an employ of the Department and deputed to the Corporation.
· First part of the Godown had a capacity of 3000 M.T. and Second Part had a capacity of 2000 M.T.
· No weighbridge was installed in the Godown to weigh the trucks bringing the Grains from the millers. The nearest place to weigh the grains was in Cuttack District at Jagatpur which was a Private weighbridge. Trucks are weighed only at the millers and no cross check done when grains reached the Godown. No samples were kept in the godown. No samples were being given at the time of issue of the grains.
B. Storage Agent Godown
1. The other part of the Godown at Salepur which was leased by the OSCSC to a Storage Agent on a monthly rent of Rs. 2000.
(i) Condition of the Godown was as follows:-
· Electronic weighing machine used for weighing bags was installed in the Godown.
· This weighing machine at the Godown seemed to be a new one since the plastic cover of the machine was not torn off. It appeared not to have been used at all.
· But Storage Agent informed the Committee that this machine was installed 4 months ago.
· The Weight memo issued at the time of delivery of grain from the Millers Mill to the Storage Agent Godown was cross checked by the Supply inspector and BDO.
· BDO informed the Committee that Civil Supply Officer (CSO) informs him about the delivery of grains through a letter asking him to go for inspection.
· Records of this inspection by the BDO of the Weight memo was maintained in the Tally Register, which was kept by the Storage Agent only. This Register was also very new and appeared to have been prepared recently presumably for the visit of the Committee. But Storage Agent said that this Register was being maintained for the last 3 months i.e. since he had taken the charge of this Godown.
· The newly prepared records of the Storage agent did not show that they were verified by the Department Officials.
· No records are kept by the departmental officer in charge for ensuring that the Food grains are reaching the Storage Agent Godown or not.
· Name of the Storage Agent was Mr. R.C. Prushti. But his son Mr. Ajay Kumar Prushti managed the Godown as he has the power of attorney from his father in his name.
· The Storage Agent has taken over charge of this Godown only 3 months back on the death of the Storage Agent who was previously handling this Godown.
· Prof. Kalindi Behra (MLA) had recommended the name of present Storage Agent for the appointment as the Storage Agent for this Godown.
· Renewal of License was done in every two years.
· This Storage Agent picked his quota from Orissa State Warehousing Block Godown, Jagatpur.
· He informed the committee that he paid Rs 300 for Wheat and Rs 150-180 for Rice to the OSCSC Labour at the time of loading and unloading of Food grain from the OSCSC Godown.
· This Labour was under the employment of OSCSC and is paid labour.
· The Banner lying outside the Storage Agent Godown containing the name of the Storage Agent is made on the same material of same colour which was used for making banners mentioning about the arrival and welcome of committee.
· Computerization is easily possible. Connectivity is not at all a problem.
· Samples are available in the Godown.
· FCI person comes for checking the level of moisture in the food grain on the next day of arrival of food grain from the millers.
· The Storage Agent was issued gate passes at the Orissa State Warehousing Corporation (OSWC) each time when he went for collecting the food grains.
· The Storage Agent had ample notice of visit of the Committee to his godown.
(ii) The Committee found:-
· The records were all presented in crisp new books and appeared to be prepared keeping in mind the visit of the Committee.
· It was a stage managed event which confirmed our suspicions that the storage agent is a device to ensure diversion.
· As to what was visible to the naked eye was that there was no weighment and no method to properly verify the exact amount of stock received and disbursed
· The electronic weighing machine looked so new and unused.
· The Corporation had no explanation in respect of the query of the committee as to the need to have a storage agent in a state owned godown. The Corporation also had no answer or justification as to why this additional intermediary was required when the FPS dealer was in fact directly lifting his goods from the said godown.
2. The Committee thereafter visited a private godown managed by a Storage Agent in Talecher, Angul District
(i) The details of the Storage Agent are :-
Storage Agent Name - Kailash Chand Agarwala
Licence No. - 01/2005-06
Position of the Stock in the Godown was :
Commodity Rate/Quintal Stock
Sugar 1340 24.17q
Wheat 682 702.12q
BPL Rice 180 3 q
AAY Rice 180 Nil
APL Rice 930 Nil
Palmolive Oil 47.58 2200 ltrs
(ii) The Committee then probed the viability of the business of a storage agent from PDS goods. The agent gave us the following calculation
Calculation for Gross Expense
Particulars (Quintal/Rs) Monthly Figures(Rs)
a. Rice from Angul ( 2000 X 11.50 ) - 23000
Labour 4/- - 8000
b. Wheat From JagatPur (1000 q X 42/- ) - 42000
Labour 4/- - 4000 Staff Expense - 1000
c. Sugar from BBSR (90 q X 50/- ) - 4500
Labour - 360 Staff - 200
d. Oil from Angul ( 1000 carton X 4/-) - 4000
______ Gross Expense 87060
Calculation for Gross Income
a. Rice Commission ( 2000 X 6.50 ) - 13000
b. Wheat Commission (1000 X 5.50 ) - 5500
c. Sugar Commission ( 90 X 2.50 ) - 225
d. Oil Commission ( 1000 Litre ) - 200
Frieght charges paid by Department
e. Rice (2000 X 8 ) - 16000
f. Wheat ( 1000 X 24 ) - 24000
g. Sugar ( 90 X 30 ) - 2700
h. Oil ( 1000 X 2 ) - 2000
Gross Income 63625
(iii) On the basis of these figures provided by the Agent – Mr. Kailash Chand Aggarwala, it appears that he is incurring a monthly loss of Rs 23,435/-. The question which Committee is faced with is as the how this agent is in a position to sustain himself and keep the agency running despite incurring such a substantial monthly loss.
(iv) An official of the department accompanying the team at this point conversed with the storage agent in Oriya whereupon Mr. Kailash Chand re worked the calculations showing a profit of Rs. 7545/- now.
Re-worked Calculation for Gross Expense
a. Rice from Angul (2000 X 8) - 16000
Labour 4/- - 4000
b. Wheat from JagatPur (1000 q X 27/-) - 27000
Labour 2/- - 2000 Staff Expense - 1500
c. Sugar from BBSR (90 q X 32/-) - 2880
Staff - 200
d. Oil from Angul (1000 carton X 2/-) - 2000
Labour - 500 ______
Gross Expense 56080
Re-worked Calculation for Gross Income
a. Rice Commission (2000 X 6.50) - 13000
b. Wheat Commission (1000 X 5.50) - 5500
c. Sugar Commission (90 X 2.50) - 225
d. Oil Commission (1000 Litre) - 200
Re-worked Freight charges paid by Department
e. Rice (2000 X 8) - 16000
f. Wheat (1000 X 24) - 24000
g. Sugar (90 X 30) - 2700
h. Oil (1000 X 2) - 2000
Re-worked Gross Income 63625
(v) Certain other observations made at this Godown revealed the following:-
a. That the Storage Agent received grain directly from Angul Godown.
b. There was an occasional electricity problem.
c. That the Storage Agent apart from dealing in PDS Commodities, sold Amul products and was also an Airtel Connection Dealer.
d. He stated that he did not only rely on income coming from distribution of PDS commodities since he had other form of businesses running on his name.
e. There were 41 shops in a municipal area and 120 at the Block level connected to his storage agency.
f. The weighment of Food grain was done by a manual scale.
g. The Storage Agency had a computer and private Internet connectivity which was his personal.
h. The Storage Agent did not have any sample in his Godown. He informed the committee that when he receives grain from FCI or Millers, the Departmental officials take Samples for checking them in the laboratory; however no records in this regard were being maintained. He further stated that he was taking samples on his own for issuance to the retailers.
i. Operating a storage agency is really not a viable enterprise and reinforces an inference that the additional intermediary viz. the storage agent is probably meant only as an additional diversion point.
J. Both storage agents interviewed by the Committee stated that without political patronage they cannot continue in business as they have to be recommended by the local MLA.
K. The two questions that are therefore posed for consideration are as to whether a storage agent is required at all and secondly even if assuming for the sake of argument that this intermediary is required, whether the elected representatives should have a role to play in the process of storage agents.
on its visit to another private godown managed by a storage agent in
III. DIVERSION OF PDS STOCK
The issue of Diversion can be could be broadly categorized as:-
· Weighment of food grains
· Storage agents
3.1 Recycling -The Committee learnt about the system of recycling.
A) OSCSC is allowed to procure paddy on behalf of the FCI under the Decentralized Procurement Scheme. The State Government through OSCSC procures paddy and gives it to the millers who extract rice and give it back to the OSCSC.
B) As per the rules the millers should not be related to the storage agents. In practice it was found out that all the millers and storage agents worked in close co-ordination with each other. It was also found that in fact the millers on behalf of the OSCSC were doing the procurement.
C) The millers exaggerate the quantities which they would be supplying to the OSCSC/FCI. They in fact procure lesser quantities. After extracting rice from the procured quantities they supply same to the OSCSC/FCI as per agreement. Then they slow down or stop further supplies till the rice already supplied has been allocated to the storage agents. The storage agents transfer some part of this rice back to the miller who again supplies the same to OSCSC/FCI.
To illustrate, a miller agrees to supply 1000 MT. He would initially supply only 700 MT and then wait till the allocation is made to the storage agent’s. 300MT would be recycled and received back by the millers from the storage agents and again supplied to the OSCSC/Government.
D) The people who attended a public hearing on the 22nd November also spoke about the recycling system. As a matter of fact, the Committee was also informed that Millers have to pay 3% of their revenue earned from OSCSC for smooth functioning.
3.2 Weighment of food grains.
A. On Visiting Godowns of OSCSC and Storage Agents, the Committee found that there are no proper weighment methods to weigh the food grains. Most of the Godowns did not have adequate weighing machines. Godowns store a large quantity food grains but machines of lower capacity are installed at these Godowns. For instance Mancheshwar Godown owned by the Corporation had a weighing machine with capacity of 3 quintals only.
B. Lower capacity weighing machines was not the only problem regarding the weighment of food grains. The local officials informed the Committee that storage agents received food grains in shortage in weight from the FCI/FSD and in turn they also deliver the same bags with shortage in weight to the FPS after taking out their quota.
3.3 Storage Agents.
A. In the public meetings it was the general complaint made to the committee that storage agents were the biggest problem and one of the major factors responsible for the diversion of food grains.
B. The committee visited several Storage Agencies in the state of Orissa. On enquiring from various storage agencies it was learned that the weight of the empty gunny bags used for food grains by the millers and the FCI was 650 grams and was included in the weight of 50 kg bag.
C. It was also informed to the committee that the storage agents were not issued any samples of food grains. It was also learned by the committee that an initial sum of Rs. 4 lakhs had to be deposited with the OSCSC as a down payment and security fees by all the storage agents.
D. It will be relevant to point out that at this stage the Committee found that bags of rice which were supplied to the storage agent did not contain full quantity of 50kgs. On an average a bag contained 2-3kgs less rice. Thus for every 100 quintals the storage agent received 15 to 20 extra bags. It was also learnt that fair price shops were not being supplied rice by weighing but on the basis of no. of bags. They were told that fewer quantities are being received in every bag, therefore either 2 consumers were given 1 bag or 1 consumer was given a bag for two months quota and not by weight. Since each consumer was supposed to get 25 kgs every month, he was only getting proportionately less quantities.
E. The Storage agents thereby extract certain quantities from the bags containing food grains and supply the extracted food grains either back to the miller as stated above under the heading of “RECYCLING”. They also divert this extracted grain to other resources.
F. Storage agents are not only a mechanism for diversion but also were the main reasons for the lack of proper functioning of PDS in Orissa.
G. As stated in the introductory lines, the system of storage agents was introduced in the initial period of OSCSC when it did not have any self owned Godowns but now OSCSC has its own Godown everywhere in the state and even leasing out Godowns to these storage agents for their use, so the system of this Storage Agents (intermediaries) does not hold any merit.
4.1 There is unbridled political interference in the selection of the storage agents and all procedures are given a go bye by the department if there is a “political” recommendation.
4.2 The Committee found that the process of weighment followed in the godowns was by and large manual and was therefore susceptible to pilferage and diversions.
4.3 The Committee found that bags of rice which were supplied from the FCI/FSD to the godowns did not contain full quantity of 50 kgs. On an average a bag contained 2-3kgs less rice. Thus for every 100 quintals the storage agent received 15 to 20 extra bags. It was also learnt that godowns were supplied the food grain by counting the number of bags and taking the average weight of each bag as 50 kg. Thus the remaining could be easily diverted.
4.4 Operating a storage agency is really not a viable enterprise. It reinforces an obvious inference that the additional intermediary viz. the storage agent is probably meant only as an additional diversion point.
4.5 The Panchayat Raj Department has 6000 godown of 50 MT capacity and 300 godown of 100 MT capacity but the OSCSC is not interested in hiring these godowns. The Panchayat Raj Department and the Urban Development are also prepared to construct more godowns if required by the OSCSC.
4.6 The position is that since the State has adequate storage facilities and sufficient resources of the Corporation, the concept of a storage agent must be done away with. It is the main source of diversion of PDS grain in Orissa.
4.7 The Chairman of the OSCSC should not be a political/private person. His appointment should be transparent. Corporation should be run strictly on professional basis.
RETAIL OUTLETS (FAIR PRICE SHOPS)
In the State of
Apart from this, State has mobile vans owned by the
OSCSC. Total number of Mobile vans running presently in the State of
In this Chapter, the Committee deals with the method adopted for appointment of retail outlets in Orissa, their viability and the different types of retail outlets currently operating in the State.
I. MODE OF APPOINTMENT OF DEALERS.
1.1 STATUTORY FRAMEWORK
A. Clause 4 of the Orissa PDS Control Orders 2008 provides for the modes and methods of appointments of Fair Price Dealers.
B. Clause 5 provides for the prohibition in respect of grant of licence which includes that a licensee or his family member shall not have any commercial interest in the business which pertains to PDS Commodities and also provides that neither dealer nor members of his family shall be member of any advisory committee.
C. The definition of family under the clause is interesting in as much as it includes only “dependent parents” and unmarried sons and daughters. The loopholes are apparent as a married son can under the PDS Control Order do competing business.
D. Executive instructions No. 14200(13) dated 21-04-1992 containing instructions on appointment and removal of retailers is still in vogue. The said instruction envisages that the Block Level Advisory Committee (BLAC) and Town Level Advisory Committee (TLAC) are to make recommendations for appointment of Retailers. The nature and composition of such Committees are elaborated in the chapter dealing with the vigilance mechanism. The said instruction also provides that there should be one retailer for a population of 2000 in the plains and one retailer for the population of 1000 in the hilly areas. The maximum no. of retail outlets should not exceed 3 in a Gram Panchayat area but may be increased up to 5 in an inaccessible/hilly area.
1.2 The Committee during the visit learned that the Sub Collector on the recommendations of the Block Level Advisory Committees/ Taluk Level Advisory Committees (BLAC / TLAC) appoints the dealers. It was further learned that preference is given to gram panchayats, women self help groups and cooperatives. The licensing provisions for retailers, their duties and responsibility are laid down in the Orissa PDS (control) orders, 2008. It was also observed by the Committee that the following entities operate FPS outlets in the State,
a. Private individuals
c. Women’s Self Help Groups.
d. Maitri Shops/Model Fair Price Shops. Both operated by the OSCSC
e. Mobile Vans
Note: - The Order of preference for the appointment of FPS dealer is stipulated in Clause 4(3) of the Orissa Control Order, 2008 as follows:
The First preference for appointment and grant of licence as retailer shall be given to Gram Panchayats, followed by women self help groups, Co-operative Societies and other self help groups in that order of preference;
1.3 Files Regarding Appointment Of Retailers
A. Committee inspected the files pertaining to the appointment of dealers which revealed that
· No public advertisement is issued regarding vacancies.
· Applications are made to the Sub-Collector/Additional District Magistrate (ADM).
· Meetings of Taluk level Advisory Committes or Block Level Advisory Committees takes place whenever there is a vacancy.
· Names are recommended by the BLAC / TLAC to the Sub-Collector/ADM.
· Sub Collector or ADM does the necessary verifications if required.
· The Sub-Collector/ ADM executes the agreement with the dealer.
B. The Committee made the following observations –
· There is no transparent mode of appointment as admittedly no advertisement is issued.
· The Taluk and Block Level Advisory Committee would meet only when a “convenient” application is made and what is worse is that only the “convenient” application is considered and the previous applications are ignored.
· The system requiring the BLAC and TLAC to be a part of the recommendatory process results in a direct conflict of interest as it is the same entity which is entrusted with the task of vigilance as well as choosing the fair price shop.
The extent of
political interference and arbitrariness in the process of allotment of outlets
came to light when the Committee visited retail outlets in Rajabagicha lane,
II. VIABILITY & CONDITION OF THE RETAIL OUTLETS
The Committee visited various retail outlets in the State and found that the shops were either making only marginal profits or were incurring losses. On the visit of the Committee to an outlet run by a private individual the following observations were made,
Name of the Retailer: - Mr. Birender Kumar Bhayan
Name of the Gram Panchayat:- Chandradepur
Name of the Block: - Salepur
No. Of Cards attached: - BPL APL AAY AY
212 300 154 11
B. It was observed by the committee that everything was in order as it was obvious that it was stage managed by the State Government for the purpose of the Committees visit. Therefore the Committee took the opportunity to access the viability of the fair price shop and got a detailed costing which indicated that the net profit earned was only Rs. 657 whereas his helper was getting a salary of Rs 900 per month. The dealer informed the committee that he would be happy with a net profit of Rs. 1000-1500 and wanted a marginal increase in the commission. He also wanted permission to sell other household items. It was observed that no samples were kept in the shop.
1. Income earned from selling Rice [(107 X 200) – (107 X 1800)]= 2140
2. Income from Kerosene (@ 0.30 X 2500) = 750
3. Income from Sugar (@ 0.10 X 300) = 300
4. Income from Wheat (@ 0.25 X 600) = 150
5. Income by selling the Sacks = 1000
Gross Income Rs. 4340
1. Salary of the Employee = 900
2. Shop Rent = 1000
3. Transport and handling/loading Unloading Charges
i. For Rice ( Rs 14/quintal X 107 ) = 1498
ii. For Oil ( Rs 20/barrel X 12 ) = 240
( 1 Barrel = 200 Lits )
iii. For Sugar ( Rs 5/quintal X 3 ) = 15
iv. For Wheat ( Rs 5/quintal X 6 ) = 30
Total Expenditure Rs. 3683
Thus, Net Income of the FPS Owner was (4340 – 3683) = Rs 657
D. This would clearly indicate that the shop in its present form is unviable. It is obvious that with such income, the shop keeper would be indulging in illegal activities of diversion for the purpose of his very existence.
2.2 Visit to FPS Shop at Bada Danda Sahi, Talcher, Angul District
A. Name of the FPS Owner - Raj Kumar Mishra
Licence No. - 1/2002-03
B. The said dealer has being dealing in this business for last 18 years.
C. Position of the Cards attached to his shop are :-
APL BPL AAY
274 51 20
D. He stated that his average monthly income was Rs. 1100/- to 1500/-. Calculations showing this profit are: -
Type of Commodity
Quantity Allotted every Month (quintals/litres)
Commission per Quintal (Rs)
Empty Gunny Bags
E. He said that only expense he has to bear is transportation as his shop is part of his house and electricity charges are covered under house electricity bill. Transportation cost for a month comes to Rs. 300/-.
Thus, his net monthly profit is Rs 1393 – 300 = Rs 1093/-
F. The Committee found that:-
1. List of Beneficiaries was found to be displayed outside the shop.
2. He had distributed the entire quota of this month.
3. He informed the committee that he wants to sell other commodities also but the department does not permit this.
4. Three years ago, he was selling non PDS Commodities but was stopped from doing so by the Departmental officers. However Government Officials who are accompanying the Committee clarified that there was no such prohibition for selling non PDS Commodities.
5. He also informed the Committee that the last time anyone from vigilance committee visited his shop was three years ago and no one has come since then.
6. License was renewed every year by the concerned authorities.
2.3 Visit to the FPS Shop run by Women self helf group (WSHG), Talechar
A. License No. of Shop was 14/2004-05.
B. Shop was run by a WSHG consisted of 10 members.
C. Name of the Group was Mahashivani.
D. Mrs. Ritala Maharanna, member of the WSHG present at the shop stated that they had small savings (personal) every month, which help them running the shop.
E. She said they are making a profit of Rs 400 – Rs 500/- every month from this shop.
F. Position of the card attached to the shop are :
APL BPL AAY
30 72 15
G. She stated that personal rapport with beneficiaries was essential for running the shop efficiently.
H. Out of the 10 members of the WSHG, 8 are cardholders which helps them in understanding the position of the other cardholders.
I. They have been running this shop for last 4 years.
J. This group also imparts training to people for making toys for a living.
K. Since they belong to the same group, they ensure the proper delivery of the food grain.
L. This Shop is operated from the house of one of the member present there who rented out this portion of the house to SHG for running this shop for a rent of Rs. 250 per month.
M. The Committee interviewed one member of the WSHG. During the interview when her husband tried to intervene, she politely told him that it was her enterprise and he should keep out of the interview.
N. On being asked whether the officials or others in the chain demanded bribe they answered that they don’t pay bribes even if demanded.
O. The visit to this shop run by the Women SHG was certainly positive.
2.4 Visit to Model Fair Price Shop (Maitree Shop)
The Committee visited a Model Fair Price Shop (Maitre
Shop)-cum-Government Storage Agent Godown owned by the OSCSC at Sector 6,
Cuttack Development Authority,
A. The Corporation has 38 MFPS under its control to provide Rice, Wheat, Sugar and Kerosene Oil to the PDS consumers covered under different schemes. Besides the above, some other essential consumers goods are sold through the MFPS.
B. Mr. Liyakat Ali (Storage Agent cum Godown Assistant) was in charge of the shop.
1. Details of the cards attached to the shop are :-
BPL AAY APL
3476 1456 2890 203
2. Four Maitre shops were covering the all BPL,
AAY and Annapurna Card Holder requirement in
17,443 5966 740
3. In the shop Committee visited, 3 persons are employed.
4. This Shop also sells many other Non PDS Commodities like Pulses, Salt, other brand Palmoline Oil, etc.
5. Current Stock position of the Shop was:-
Category Wheat Rice
APL 102.52 qtls
BPL 264.76 qtls
AAY 325.90 qtls
6. No sealed samples are available in the shop.
7. Records are properly maintained in the shop. List of all beneficiaries are displayed outside the shop.
8. The weekly holiday of the shop was on Thursday.
9. Empty gunny bags were sold for Rs. 7 or 8 per bag.
10. The shop was earning profits. (Both from sale of PDS Goods and other activities).
11. The shop worked as a storage Godown as well as retailer shop.
12. Private Retailers also take their quota from this Maitre Shop.
D. The Visit to the Shop brought into the notice the following facts:-
1. The model fair price shop which works both as a wholesale and retail outlet and which sells non PDS commodities as well, seem to work well and were also making profits.
2. Keeping in mind the success of the maitree shops or the model fair price shops, the question thus arises for consideration is whether in terms of the obligations set out in the PDS Control Order, the Government itself must undertake the task of door step distribution without franchising the same to private persons.
2.5 Visit to FPS operated by Gram Panchayat Gursang Block Talechar, District Angul.
A. The Gram panchayat had 8 villages attached to it.
B. Position of the cards attached to the gram Panchayat was -:
AAY BPL APL
70 NIL NIL
C. The Committee found that:-
The licence for the shop is in the name of Panchayat Secretary. The Shop is run by the panchayat secretary who is a government servant and hence this FPS in all respects is a government shop. Although the shop was operating at a very small scale having only AAY cards, the shop was totally uninspiring and showed that the shops run by the panchayats in contradistinction to the Corporation run Maitree shops were not run in an efficient and orderly manner.
A. Details of the Gram Panchayat:-
Name of Gram Panchayat secretary - Mr Gorang Sahu
Stock In Charge - Mr. Patoa
No of cards:-
AAY – 7
Villages attached to the Gram Panchayat - 6
B. The visit showed that in a village setting the PDS system had totally broken down and the person who are most vulnerable are not protected by the PDS owing to the tardy working of the shop. It was strange to find out that exclusion errors were apparent as many families who are living in a very poor state having nothing to eat were excluded from the system as a whole. Those persons who are within the system also had little or no access to it owing to the poor working of the PDS Shop.
C. It was found that most of the genuine persons do not possess any card. There are many families in the village who are very poor and living in a very bad state having nothing to eat. This again leads to the inevitable inference that exclusion/inclusion errors are one of the major maladies afflicting the PDS. The team also visited a FPS shop run by the gram Panchayat situated in the Chamunda village.
D. The major maladies affecting the functioning of PDS in the district is the presence of naxalites in that area. The presence of Maoists in these areas has become a cause for considerable alarm. This is compounded by factors such as inaccessible hilly terrain, dense forests and lack of development. The officials also use this as an excuse for not performing their duties relating to PDS in these areas.
E. The officials also used the presence of naxalites as an excuse for not performing their duty. The situation in an interior and poverty striker part of the State was grim and shocking and requires urgent redress to ensure
food security reaches the poorest of the poor.
F. Further Observations made by the committee are –
· Visit was made in order to study the working of fair price shop in an interior and rural setting.
· Secretary of the Panchayat who was the incharge of the shop failed to produce any records or registers about the working of FPS Shop.
· Secretary first stated that he does not have any records and later he said that he can not show any records as they are in the possession of some other person.
· Only 2 Litre of Keroseine Oil was distributed to every card holder but entry was made for 4 Litre.
· There was no electricity in the village. It was stated by the Villager that two years earlier the Village was electrified. However for the over one year, the transformer was burnt. Villagers were told unless they contribute towards the price of transformer, new transformer will not be put up. Considering the poverty existing in the village, it would appear that new transformer will never be put up.
2.7 MOBILE VANS
A. The Corporation has started operation of Mobile Vans in the
State from the year 1985. As many as 145 Mobile Vans were purchased out of
funds provided by Government of India on 50 : 50 loan and subsidy basis for
utilization in inaccessible area by way of ‘Hat sale’, with an aim to ensure
distribution of essential commodities at the door steps of the poor and needy
consumers. At present 94 Mobile Vans are running in 15 districts. Out of that,
there are 40 Mobile Vans operating in 6 KBK districts of the State. The
Committee was told that 51
To Mobile Van In
1. Villagers were very happy with the working of mobile van.
2. Distribution of food grain was done in more proper and better way than the FPS Shop.
3. 3 persons are employed in the mobile van. They are sales man, Driver and Helper.
4. The salary of these 3 persons for a month are :-
Driver – 8000
Helper – 80 Rs Daily
Sales Man - 5000
5. This mobile van was also used for transportation of food grain from godowns to Gram Panchayat, FPS Shops, Maitree Shops, etc.
On the day of
7. Total grain distributed to the Card holders was 69.45 quintal.
8. The difference of 55 kg was Shortage in weight in the gunny bags received from Storage Agent.
9. Total Cards attached to this Mobile Van are :-
APL - 97
BPL - 136
AAY - 32
10. Manual Weighing Scale was used.
11. The State Government has introduced a system of distributing the food grains on fixed dates i.e. 5th, 6th, 7th, 20th, 21st and 22nd day of every month. Special permission has to be taken from the collector for distributing grain on non distribution day.
2.8 Viability of Fair price shop is critical to sustenance of Public distribution system and to minimize leakage of PDS grains. The number of ration cards attached to FPS, their BPL-APL breakup, off take of grains, margin on commodities, cost incurred on transport and handling, rents etc. are the determinant of viability of FPS’s. Programme Evaluation Organization under Planning Commission in its evaluation Report of year 2005 on TPDS put that Viability of FPS means an annual return of 12% or more on the working capital. This has been again mentioned in 11th Five Year Plan report of Planning Commission.
III. FIXED DISTRIBUTION DAYS AND RELATED PROBLEMS
3.1 The State Government has introduced a system of distributing the food grains on fixed dates i.e. 5th, 6th, 7th, 20th, 21st and 22nd day of every month. This system may be convenient for the State Government officials but causes many difficulties for the beneficiaries. It should not be forgotten that the Public Distribution System is for the benefit of the public and not for the convenience of the implementing authorities. There are long queues at every FPS on the distribution days. If some beneficiary who is daily wage earner comes to get his ration he has to forego his earning for that day. The beneficiary is compelled to take his entire entitlement on one day. This system is clearly violating of the directions of the Supreme Court contained in the order dated May 2, 2003 in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 196 of 2001. The Supreme Court has directed that Licensees who do not keep their shops open throughout the month during the stipulated period shall make themselves liable for cancellation of their license. This order also provides that in order to facilitate the supply of grain the BPL house hold should be permitted to buy the ration in installments. Both these directions are thus being flouted because of the distribution of ration only on fixed dates.
OBSERVATIONS IN RESPECT RETAIL DISTRIBUTION IN THE STATE OF
4.1 The visit to the shop run by the Women SHG had many positives. However, such shops face tremendous difficulties in terms of the low number of cards being allotted to them and thus low commission and short delivery of stock. The WSHG, however, have to be those which have an existing track record and not one created only to run an FPS. That is to say those WSHG’s created under the Integrated Child Development Scheme (ICDS) and allied schemes of Government.
4.2 Maitre shops operated by the Corporation were found to be operated more efficiently than privately managed shops.
4.3 The outlet operated by the Gram Panchayat is run by the panchayat secretary who is a government servant and in all respects is a government shop. Although the shop visited the Committee was operating at a very small scale having only AAY cards, yet the visit to this shop was uninspiring and showed that the shops run by the panchayats in contradistinction to the Corporation run Maitree shops were not run in an efficient and orderly manner.
4.4 The general condition of the retail outlets was found to be poor and the guidelines contained in the Control Orders are not being followed in letter and spirit.
4.5 Political interference in the appointment of retail dealers is wide spread.
4.6 Weighing of stock is being done manually which facilitates diversion.
4.7 There is a shortage of 1 or 2 Kgs in every jute bag of 50 Kg received from the godown of Storage Agents as mentioned in detail in paragraph 2.6 of the Chapter dealing with Wholesale distribution.
4.8 The quality of rice distributed under the PDS System is found not to be good.
4.9 The State Government has introduced a system of distributing the food grain on fixed dates i.e. 5th, 6th, 7th, 20th, 21st and 22nd of every month. This system may be convenient for the State Government officials but causes many difficulties for the beneficiaries. It should not be forgotten that the Public Distribution System is for the benefit of the public and not for the convenience of the implementing authorities. There are long queues at every FPS on the distribution days. If some beneficiary who is daily wage earner comes to get his ration he has to forego his earning for that day. The beneficiary is compelled to take his entire entitlement on one day. This system is clearly violating of the directions of the Supreme Court contained in the order dated May 2, 2003 in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 196 of 2001. The Supreme Court has directed that Licensees who do not keep their shops open throughout the month during the stipulated period shall make themselves liable for cancellation of their license. This order also provides that in order to facilitate the supply of grain the BPL house hold should be permitted to buy the ration in installments. Both these directions are thus being flouted because of the distribution of ration only on fixed dates.
4.10 Mobile Vans are an important tool for improving the coverage of the PDS and therefore the number of Mobile Vans must be increased to ensure that the outreach of the PDS is increased.
4.11 FPS owners should be permitted to stock and sell non PDS Commodities also like tea, oil, dals, etc. to make business profitable and cover their losses if any. In fact the concept of a stand alone FPS outlet is an inherently unviable proposition. From the present regime of stand alone shops to a regular kirana/grocery shop which also sells FPS commodities, with the rider that the shop will not sell PDS food grains.
4.12 In a village setting the PDS system had totally broken down and the persons who are most vulnerable are not protected by the PDS owing to the tardy working of the shop. It was strange to find out that exclusion errors were apparent as many families who are living in a very poor state having nothing to eat were excluded from the system as a whole. Those persons who are within the system also had little or no access to it owing to the poor working of the PDS Shop.
4.13 The officials also used the presence of naxalites as an excuse for not performing their duty. The situation in an interior and poverty stricken part of the State was grim and shocking and requires urgent redress to ensure food security reaches the poorest of the poor.
1.1 There are three main mode in the Public
Distribution System in the State of
1.2 FCI Godowns to OSCSC Godowns or Storage Agent Godown: The OSCSC/Storage Agent is responsible for the transportation of the food grains from the FCI Godown to their own Godown. The cost of the transportation is paid by the State Government through the OSCSC and that the transportation is done by the transporters who are appointed by tender process.
1.3 OSCSC Godown to Storage Agent Godown : When the OSCSC procures food grain under the Direct Procurement Scheme on the behalf of FCI, and store in their own Godown, then the Storage Agent is responsible for transportation of the food grain from OSCSC Godown to their own Godown. The cost of the transportation is paid by the State Government through the OSCSC
1.4 OSCSC or Storage Agent Godown to Fair Price Shop: The fair price shop owner arranges transport for transporting the food grains from the OSCSC or Storage Agent Godown to the fair price shop. FPS owner has to bear the cost of transportation is included in his margin.
1.5 As in the State, the responsibility to transport food grain has been entrusted to the Storage Agent, the Agreement is made between the Storage Agent and the OSCSC. The Agreement clearly puts the responsibility of Transportation of food grain on the Storage Agent for which he gets the commission.
1.6 Clause 7 of the agreement between Storage Agent and OSCSC requires the Storage Agent to make arrangements for transportation for which he is reimnursed in accordance with approved rates revised from time to time. The rates are as follows :-
Up to to 10 km
Beyond 10 Km
1. The role and responsibilities of Storage Agent are
provided in Clause 11 of Orissa PDS Order, 2008. Interestingly however, the
said Clause does not provide any specific responsibilities for safe
transportation of food grain. No such obligation is found in the agreement
between the Storage Agent and OSCSC. It is a well established fact that a lot
of the diversion takes place during transits of Goods. Yet in the State of
2. A proper vigil has to be kept on transportation of the foodgrain at all level i.e. from FCI to Storage Agent and at the time of Storage Agent to Fair price shop. GPS system can be used for tracking the movement of Trucks carrying foodgrainn. For this, routes that have to be followed by Trucks carrying food grains have to be prepared and specified. Devices required for GPS should be installed on every such Truck and movement of the Truck should be monitored. Attachment of device of GPS in the Trucks engaged in Public Distribution System may be made part of the tender conditions.
3. There should be routine daily physical checking of the GPS Units to detect any tampering etc. Any tampering with GPS system installed on the Trucks carrying food grains or any deviation of the Truck from the route prescribed would be considered as violation of the Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2001.
4. Though the task of monitoring the functioning of GPS should be with the Department and in addition, the Ombudsman will also have access to the system to ensure its proper implementation.
VIGILANCE, ENFORCEMENT AND COMPPLAINT MECHANISM
Although the Statutory instruments namely the PDS Control Order, 2001 as well as the Orissa Control Order 2008 provide for the monitoring and Vigilance of Fair price shops, The Committee found the Vigilance mechanism is totally defunct and almost non existent. The Committee in this Chapter details its observation in this regard.
I. COMPOSITION AND FUNCTIONING OF VIGILANCE COMMITTEES.
1.1 Instruction No. 15756 dated 31.07.2006 contains government instructions on composition of Vigilance Committees. It contains two sets, one set contains old instructions of 1991 and the second set contains reconstitution of Committees and instructions thereof in 2006.
1.2 Three types of Vigilance Committees are
constituted in the State of
A. DISTRICT LEVEL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
B. TOWN /BLOCK ADVISORY COMMITTEE
C. RETAILER LEVEL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
1.3 DISTRICT LEVEL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (DLAC)
A. Composition: The composition of DLAC is as under:-
1. Collector Chairperson
2. Hon’ble MP’s or their representatives.
3. Hon’ble MLA’s or their representatives.
4. Two members of Zilla Parisad of whom
Atleast one shall be a woman to be nominated
by the Zilla Parisad.
5. Two Chairpersons of Panchayat Samities of
whom at lease one shall be a woman nominated
6. Two representatives of Voluntary Consumer
Consumer Organizations or NGO’s active in the field of
Consumer Protection of whom at lease one shall be
a woman to be nominated by Collector.
7. Additional District Magistrate (1/c of PDS)
8. Project Director, District Rural Development Agency
9. District Social Welfare Officer
Manager, Food Corporation of
11. District level Coordinator of Oil Companies
12. Civil Supplies Officer Member-Convener
B. FUNCTIONS: The functions of the District Level Advisory Committee are specified to be:-
1. To monitor the over-all functioning of Public Distribution System in the district.
2. To monitor progress in implementation of Antyodaya Anna Yojana and Annapurna Yojana and to approve beneficiary list thereof.
3. To monitor the functioning of Block / Town level Advisory Committees in the district.
4. To look into the complaints of irregularities in the Public Distribution System and to make appropriate recommendations to the Licensing Authorities concerned.
5. To ensure supply of adequate quantity and prescribed quality of PDS commodities through the Public Distribution System.
6. Such other functioning as may be entrusted to the Committee by the State Government.
7. The Committee is required to meet atleast once in a quarter or more frequently as required.
1.4 TOWN /BLOCK ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TLAC/BLAC)
Instruction No. 16958(30)/SFS&CW dated 16-08-2006 on constitution of Town / Block Level Advisory Committee is as follows:-
1. Hon’ble MLA of the local constituency Chairperson
2. Chairperson of the Urban Local Body Member
3. Hon’ble MP or his representatives Member
Urban Local Body concerned as follows: Member
(a) for ULBs with upto 16 wards 2
(b) for ULBs with more than 16 and upto 20 Wards 4
(c) for ULBs with more than 20 Wards 5
5. One representative of a Voluntary Consumer
Organization to be nominated by the Collector Member
6. One representative of women Self Help Group
(other than PDS licensee to be nominated by Member
7. Three consumers of which at lease one shall be a
Woman and one from ST/SC community Member
8. ASCO concerned Member
9. Inspector of Supplies Member
10. ARCs Member
11. Executive Officer of Urban Local Body
Concerned Member Convenor
B. Additionally the following representatives from the following categories shall be inducted as members:-
(1) Two Sarapanches to be nominated by the Collectors (in place of one Sarapanch at present)
(2) Four Consumers to be nominated by the Collector (in place of three at present) out of whom at least one shall be a woman and one from SC/ST community.
(3) One representative of Voluntary Consumer Organisation to be nominated by the Collector.
(4) Two representatives of WSHGs (other than PDS licensee to be nominated by the Collector.
C. FUNCTIONS OF THE BLAC:- The functions allocated to be Block Level Advisory Committee are :-
1. To monitor receipt of stocks of essential commodities;
2. Ensure their proper distribution;
3. To make recommendations for appointment of retailers;
4. Suggest measures for ensuring availability of Essential Commodities, for holding the price line, for ensuring equitable distribution of the allotted stocks to the consumers with the area;
5. To detect and prevent malpractices.
D. Instruction No. 6540(13)/F&CS-PL.IP-59/90 dated 20.2.1991 provides that the meetings of Block Level Advisory Committee shall ordinarily be held once every month and at intervals not exceeding one month.
E. Block Development Officer (BDO) is required to convene the meeting and also keep record of the proceedings of the meeting duly authenticated by the members present.
1.5 RETAIL LEVEL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (RLAC)
Instruction No. 15758 dated 31.07.2006 lays down the composition of the Retail Level Advisory Committee:-
1. Rural Areas:-
(i) Sarapanch of the Gram Panchayat concerned Chairperson
(ii) All Ward Member(s) in whose ward area
The FPS’s are situated.
(iii) Four literate consumers from the area of operation
of each of the FPS’s in the GP of which at lease
one shall be woman and one from SC/ST community
(to be nominated by the G.P.)
(iv) One representative of a WSHG (other than
a PDS licensee (WSHG) from the GP area
to be nominated by the BDO.
(v) One voluntary Consumer Organization / NGO
active in the field of consumer protection
from the GP area to be nominated by the BDO.
(vi) One consumer from each of the Fair Price Shop
area to be nominated by Hon’ble MLA.
(vii) Executive Officer of the GP - Member Convener.
2. Urban Areas:- The composition of RLACs in the Urban Areas is to be as follows:-
(i) Councilor of the Ward within which Chairperson &
FPS is situated. Convener
(ii) Councilors of other Wards if any,
Whose areas are serviced by the FPS.
(iii) Four literate consumers from the area
of operation of the FPS of whom at lease
one from SC/ST community (to be nominated
by the Urban Local Body).
(iv) One representative of a WSHG to be
nominated by the E.O.
(v) One Voluntary Consumer Organisation / NGO
active in the field of Consumer Protection to
be nominated by the E.O.
(vi) One consumer from the FPS area to be nominated
by Hon’ble MLA
4. In the Gram Panchayat areas as well as licenses for the “haat” sale, one RLAC is to supervise all the FPS located with the FP areas. But in urban areas there has to be separate RLAC for each FPS.
5. The BDO & E.O. of the ULB (Urban Local Body) have to issue orders for constituting RLAC for urban and rural area respectively.
B. FUNCTIONS OF THE RLAC:- The functions of the RLAC are:-
1. The Retailer Level Advisory Committee shall primarily be responsible for ensuring that the retailer lifts the essential commodities allotted for the retail centre that the stocks allotted are actually brought to the retail centre and no part of the stocks allotted lapses or gets diverted for unauthorized purpose.
2. It shall verify the ration card register of the FPS regularly and report to the BDI/EO of ULB in the event of detection of fake/ghost /counterfeited cards.
1. At least two non-official members of the Committee, to be decided by the RLAC shall sign the Tally Register maintained by the retailer and certify the receipt of essential commodities allotted to the retail centre and their proper distribution. Allotment of subsequent months shall not be released until such a certificate has been recorded in the Tally Register of the Retailer.
2. The RLAC will also monitor the quality and correct quantity of FPDS commodities sold to the consumers.
3. The RLAC members will verify the use of certified weight and measures by the retailers.
4. Arrival of PDS commodities will be certified by at least two members of the RLAC (to be decided by the Committee) and the distribution of the stock will commence only after verification of arrival by these members who will then put their initials in the stock register of the retailer.
5. The RLAC will have the power to call for records of the retailer as and when decided.
6. Tally / stocks / Sale Register and complaint book of Fair price Shop will be place din every meeting of the RLAC
7. RLAC is required to meet at least once a month. The Convener i.e. Councilor is required to convene the meetings, record proceedings and to take follow-up action. Earlier to 31st July, 2006, Village Level Committees and Ward Committees were constituted for the rural and urban areas.
2.1 It was revealed that the retailers were appointed on the recommendations of the Block Level Advisory Committees (BLAC) or Taluk Level Advisory Committees (TLAC) which were also supposed to act as the Vigilance Committees under the Orissa PDS Control Order.
2.2 It is relevant to point out that the fact that the Vigilance Committee are almost defunct. This was admitted by the Government. Reference may be made to circular No. 5022 dated 28/2/2008, the Commissioner- cum-Secretary, Food, of the State which clearly stated that no meeting of the Vigilance Committee have been convened even once in several districts which include the districts visited by the Committee namely Cuttack, Angul, Sambhalpur, Bolangir and Kalahandi.
2.3 It was further discovered that these Committees do not perform any Vigilance work and were only meeting when an appointment of the dealer was to be made.
2.4 Giving a role to the vigilance Committees i.e. the BLAC and the TLAC in the appointment of retailer’s results in a direct conflict of interest and such a system must be abolished immediately. The very nature and composition of the committees would show that it is based on an unworkable model and the best vigilance would be if an end to end automated model is in place with real time public access to the data.
2.5 The Committee found that there is a complete overlapping of functions in as much as the same set of people (BLAC/TLAC) recommends persons for appointment as dealers/retailers and also are entrusted with the task of scrutinizing the performance of the said retail outlets. This completely erodes the independence and impartiality of the vigilance committees.
2.6 The Committee’s in their present form are unwieldy and there is no system in place in respect of how and when these Committee’s will meet. The Order should provide that the Convener should fix a day, time and place for the meetings every month or two months, as the case may be, so that there is no requirement for sending intimations in respect of the same to the members. A Secretary of the Department of Food and Supply, Concerned District Magistrate and concerned Block Development officer should respectively be responsible for convening the meetings of the Vigilance Committees.
III. COMPLAINT MECHANISM
3.1 The grievance redressal mechanism is also virtually non-existent and even the ‘call centre’ was found to be inadequate in its operation and effectiveness. The Committee found that the call center functioned from 8 am to 8pm on working days. The call center had a toll free no-1800 3456760. Only way of redressal was by informing the Civil Supply Officer of that particular District of which the complaint had been made. The Committee was also informed that people who filed complaints were not given a complaint number due to which following up on a complaint was not possible at all. A proper and functional helpline is suggested.
3.2 In order to ensure efficiency and optimise effectiveness of the Helpline services, the following recommendations are made:
(a) The toll free telephone Helpline facility should preferably be operative twenty-four hours a day and seven days a week.
(b). It shall be the responsibility of Ombudsman/ Regulator(whose role is being discussed a little later in this report) to catalogue the complaints/grievances received on the Helpline and to continuously monitor these grievances/complaints to ensure their ultimate resolution.
(c) The consumer/user interface aspect of the Helpline should broadly have the following basic features viz.:
(i) Providing information related services.
(ii) Registration of complaints.
(iii) Issuance of a unique identification/token number to the caller upon registration of complaints.
(iv) Mechanism to ascertain status of action taken on such registered complaints.
(d) The Department, the FCI and the OSCSC will be obliged to inform the Helpline as to when the particular FPS will get its stock. The OSCSC will also inform the Helpline about the movement of trucks to the particular shop so that any caller will be able to ascertain from the Helpline as to when stock would be available at the shop.
3.3 In order to make the Helpline effective, it is necessary:
(a). To give adequate publicity of Public Distribution System service benchmarks.
(b). Adequate publicity should be given to this toll free Helpline and the category of services that would be available to the consumers on this Helpline.
(c). Complaints received through the Helpline should be forwarded to the concerned officer in the Department not later than 24 hours from the time of receipt of the complaint.
(d). For the purposes of ensuring accountability of the official(s) who has/have been entrusted with a given complaint, it is necessary that a time bound complaint redressal mechanism is created and there should be an independent agency to periodically monitor the working of the system. This aspect has been dealt with in greater detail under a separate heading “Ombudsman/ Regulator”.
(e). In case of delay in redressal of complaints, the concerned official shall be liable for action in case of dereliction of duty, including penalty, for each day of such delay. This penalty would be paid by the State Government to the complainant at the first instance and thereafter, recovered from the concerned official.
IV. OMBUDSMAN/ REGULATOR
4.1. The Ration Card holders have been given certain entitlements under Public Distribution System. It is the responsibility of the state apparatus to ensure that these beneficiaries enjoy access to these entitlements smoothly, without let or hindrance. Public satisfaction in this field would strengthen the democratic system and reinforce public confidence. Widespread discontent will naturally provoke disruption and affect social stability adversely. Hence, it is imperative to take urgent action for suitably strengthening the vigilance and monitoring system in the existing Public Distribution System framework. This can be done by the appointment of an independent Ombudsman/Regulator.
4.2 While the Central Vigilance Committee is of the considered view that an independent monitoring mechanism for addressing consumer complaints along with a host of other related issues needs to be set up on priority. Such grievance redressal machinery would be in addition to the already existing legal remedies that may be available to an aggrieved person under Clause 11 of the Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2001. This alternative mechanism may be in the form of “Ombudsman/ Regulator” that may be created under Para 6(1) of the Annexe to Clause 8 of the Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2001. Para 6(1) of the Annexe to Clause 8 of the Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2001 casts an obligation upon the State Government to provide a proper system of monitoring FPS. This clause provides the statutory basis for setting up an independent monitoring mechanism such as an “Ombudsman/ Regulator”.
4.3 The objective of Ombudsman/ Regulator would be that he/she would act as ‘Watch Dog’ to ensure effective compliance of the PDS Control Order, 2001, The Orissa PDS control order and applicable instructions. The Ombudsman/ Regulator will also provide free, fair, independent mechanism for speedy resolution of complaints with reference to the benchmark set out in the governing statute, order and circulars by the authorities. Ombudsman/ Regulator should focus on investigating and resolving individual complaints and also address systemic issues. The Ombudsman/ Regulator provides consumers an easily accessible system, which would be just and speedy in redressal of their complaints and grievances. This should not become a procedure bound system or be driven by dilatory reports. Investigation will be resorted to wherever considered necessary by the Ombudsman/ Regulator. The Ombudsman/Regulator shall oversee the functioning of the Enforcement Branch including the Anti Hoarding Cell.
4.4 Ombudsman/ Regulator should be appointed by the Governor of Orissai in concurrence with the Chief Justice of The High Court. He or she will not be eligible for re-appointment.
4.5 Eligibility conditions
A. The Ombudsman/Regulator should be a sitting/retired member of the Orissa Higher Judicial Services who is or has been in the super time scale .
B. If the Ombudsman/Regulator is a retired member of the orissai Higher Judicial Services, he/she will remain in office for a term of three years or upon reaching the age of Sixty five, whichever is earlier.
4.6. Terms and conditions of service
The salary and allowances payable to the Ombudsman/ Regulator shall be the same as payable to a member of the Orissa Higher Judicial Service in the super time scale.
4.7 Removal and Resignation from office
Whereas a sitting member of the Orissa Higher Judicial Services will be governed by the service rules applicable to him. In the case of a retired member of the Orissa Higher Judicial Services being appointed, the following will apply: -
A. The Ombudsman/ Regulator may be removed from office by the Government any time after appointment if Ombudsman/ Regulator has:
(i). Been adjudged an insolvent; or
(ii). Been convicted of an offence involving moral turpitude; or
(iii). Become physically or mentally incapable of acting as Ombudsman/ Regulator; or
(iv). Acquired such interest as is likely to prejudicially affect his functions as Ombudsman/ Regulator; or
(v). So abused his position as to render his or her continuance in office prejudicial to the public interest.
B. However, the removal on the grounds specified in clauses (iv) and (v) can be done only in concurrence with the Chief Justice of the High Court, after following the principles of natural justice.
4.8 Functions and Responsibilities of Ombudsman/ Regulator
A. Ombudsman/ Regulator would be that he/she would act as ‘Watch Dog’ to ensure effective compliance of the PDS Control Order, 2001, The Orissa PDS control order 2008 and applicable instructions. The Ombudsman/Regulator will constantly monitor each facet of the distribution process detailed in the governing control orders and circulars to ensure inter alia that the correct quantities of SFAs reach the intented beneficiaries.
B. In addition the Ombusman/ Regulator will deal with Consumers’ complaints and grievances which may broadly be classified into two groups:
C. Basic complaints would mainly relate to non-provision of Public Distribution System items benchmarked to quality/quantity, delays, harassment etc. Complex complaints would relate to matters involving laws, enforcement deficiencies and widespread discontent. Basic complaints may require summary disposal without undertaking any detailed investigation. Complex complaints may involve proper investigation.
Having regard to the class of complaints, whether basic or complex, the functions and responsibilities of the Ombudsman/ Regulator will be as follows:
(i). To act as the repository of complaints/grievances received upon the Helpline. Ombudsman/ Regulator shall also monitor the functioning of GPS technology that may be used in the Transportation of Food grains and deal with all matters relating to consumer complaints arising from deficiencies in various stages of Public Distribution System operation;
(ii). To act as the monitoring authority in respect of functioning of the Vigilance Committees and follow up action taken by the Department on the reports/recommendations of the Vigilance Committees.
(ii). To investigate, where necessary in the judgment of the Ombudsman/ Regulator, complaints on case-by-case basis after seeking the perspectives of parties involved and making an independent assessment of complaints;
(iii). To seek resolution of complaints through application of extant law, rules and orders in complex cases based on his or her personal assessment of what is reasonable and fair;
(iv). The Ombudsman/ Regulator will have jurisdiction to address and investigate, where necessary, complaints about, inter-alia, the following matters:
· non-observance of the PDS Control Order by FPS owner.
· short supply of Food grains/sugar/kerosene oil below entitlement;
· supply of poor quality Food grains not matching the sample on display; and
· diversion of Food grains to shops other than FPS.
· the manner in which complaints received from the consumers/complainants including those on the toll free Helpline, have been dealt with by the concerned officials of the Department.
· Action taken by officials of the Department on reports of Vigilance Committees.
(v) It will be the responsibility of Ombudsman/ Regulator to devise and implement communication strategy to educate consumers as well as FPS owners about their rights and entitlements as well as various dos and don’ts of Public Distribution System.
(vi) It is made clear that the remedy to approach the Ombudsman/ Regulator would be in addition to and not in derogation of other remedies available in law.
4.9 Powers of Ombudsman/ Regulator
The powers of the Ombudsman/ Regulator, inter-alia, would include:
A. Public functionaries in the Department/Orissa State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited/Food Corporation of India, in charge of, or dealing with Public Distribution System, must function with “due diligence”; that is, they must ensure that within the framework of the system, the consumers’ entitlements of Food grains etc., are made available to them on time through the distribution network. Any deficiency or shortcoming on their part, with reference to the benchmarks, will render the functionary personally liable to action. The Ombudsman/Regulator will have the power to recommend and monitor departmental action in respect of errant officers keeping in mind the governing disciplinary rules. In cases of violation of any laws in the matter of Public Distribution System, the Ombudsman/ Regulator can direct the concerned authorities to take action against the person/party. There cannot be any corruption in Public Distribution System unless there is complicity between FPSs, Department Officials and the Transporter. While the FPS owner and the Transporter can be prosecuted under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 for violation of the provisions of law including the Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2001, it is incongruous that the Department officials who are fully involved in the crime should be proceeded against only departmentally in the absence of sanction under Section 15A of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. The Committee therefore recommends that Section 15A be suitably amended by deleting clause (b), which deals with public servants belonging to the State Governments. The Committee also recommends that till the legislature makes such an amendment as proposed, the State Government shall delegate the power of sanction for prosecution to the Ombudsman/Regulator.
B. The Ombudsman/ Regulator can recommend payment of compensation to a complainant upto a maximum amount of Rs. 5,000/-, and/or supply of goods and services as required for resolving the complaint or/and issue cease and desist order. In case of complaints of a frivolous nature, the complainant will also be liable for similar action. The amount mentioned above would be paid by the Department to the beneficiary at the first instance and would be recovered from the concerned officer.
C. The complaints received by the Ombudsman/ Regulator may be referred by him for a report from the District Vigilance Committee or FPS Vigilance Committee, as the case may be. It is clarified that this power of the Ombudsman/ Regulator to make a reference shall be in addition to and not in derogation of the powers of the Ombudsman/ Regulator to conduct an independent enquiry into complaints. While, the reports so received, will assist the Ombudsman/ Regulator in providing solution, these reports will not be binding upon the Ombudsman/ Regulator.
D. The Ombudsman/ Regulator also may not entertain a complaint if the complaint is more than 90 days old which can, however, be relaxed by Ombudsman/ Regulator in his discretion in deserving cases and final resolution of complaints will need to be prescribed for ensuring speedy and efficacious handling of complaints.
E. Time limits for addressing complaints, various stages involved in completion of investigation and final resolution of complaints will need to be prescribed by the Ombudsman/ Regulator for ensuring speedy and efficacious handling of complaints.
F. The Ombudsman/ Regulator will ensure that all codes/orders/regulations etc., are put on the website for the convenience of the consumers.
G. The Ombudsman/ Regulator will have authority to suggest/recommend changes in operational matters to smoothen and simplify the operation of the system.
The Ombudsman/ Regulator would need to be given a nucleus of staff to examine issues from both reactive and pro-active approaches.
It will be the responsibility of the Government to provide funds for implementation of the aforegoing recommendations including meeting administrative and operational expenses of the office of Ombudsman/ Regulator including the staff thereof. In this context it is relevant to point out that the Planning Commission provides funds under its plan programmes for monitoring and improvement in the management of supplies.
5.1 The duty to convene Vigilance Committees in terms of the Order of Supreme Court dated 8th May, 2002 is on the District Collector. However it was found that there is uniform non adherence to the directions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court. Responsibility has to be fix on District Collector that not only directions given by Hon’ble Supreme Court are followed, various advisory Committee’s formed under the Government Order constituting the Committee’s function strictly in accordance with there it.
5.2 Various Committees constituted under the Consumer Proctection Act, 1986 could also be entrusted with the job of Vigilance in respect of PDS.
6.1 Enforcement is in dismal state. Enforcement is virtually non-existent. In spite of their being vast complaints against the FPS owners, not much action seems to have been taken against the shopkeepers. It is stated by the State Government that periodical checks are being made by the field functionaries of Civil Supplies Department regarding regulating the sales and distribution of Essential Commodities to the ration card holders as per their entitlement. It appears enforcement is activated only in the year 2008 when it is stated that upto July 2008 1134 number of cases detected and action suggested against the dealers for contravention of the terms and condition of licences or of the Control Order issued under the Essential Commodities Act 1955. It was stated that action had also been taken against the officials for negligence of their duties. Apart from these statements no particulars have been given by the State Government. No particulars of the action taken and result thereof have been indicated by the State Government.
6.2 From the statement of pending cases under the Essential Commodities Act 1955 as furnished by the Hon’ble Orissa High Court we find the break-up of the pending cases as on 31.10.2008 is as under:
Year No. of cases pending
6.3 The number of cases decided during the last 3 years is given as under:
Year No. of cases decided
From the statement given by the High Court it would appear that the Department is not taking much interest in the follow up action of the cases.
6.3 The Committee has been suggesting that as far as infraction of any provision of law under the Essential Commodities Act 1955 is concerned, it should be a case of zero tolerance. After examining the whole lot of cases those pending in the Court and the action taken by the Department, the Committee is of the view that punitive action taken by the State Government is ineffective and inadequate. Malpractices in the PDS continue because of lack of effective enforcement system. The Supreme Court issued direction by its Order dated 2.5.2003 to facilitate the supply of foodgrains. But the Committee found during its visit that the directions were not being followed. The directions given are as under:
A. Licensees who
· Do not keep their shops open through out the month during the stipulated time.
· Fail to provide grain to BPL families strictly at BPL rates and no higher
· To keep the cards of BPL house holds with them
· Make false entries in the BPL cards,
· Engage in black marketing or siphoning away of grains to the open market and hand over such ration shops to such other person/organizations
· Shall make themselves liable for cancellation of their licenses. The concerned authorities/functionaries would not show any laxity on the subject.
B. Permit the BPL household to buy the ration in instalments.
C. Wide publicity shall be given so as to make BPL families aware of their entitlement of foodgrains.
Need of the hour is immediate setting up of enforcement mechanism.
A vigilant consumer or any vigilance set up can not succeed without a proper enforcement mechanism. Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 provides punishment for violations of the Control Orders issued under Section 3 of the Act. These provisions are technical in nature and require specially trained personnel to enforce them. The normal police have proved ineffective in enforcing these provisions.
It has also been observed that the cases filed under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 keep on pending in courts indefinitely and a large majority of cases end up in acquittal of the accused persons. It is necessary that special courts and specially trained prosecutors are appointed for the trial of these cases.
The license granted to the dealers lay down certain conditions. The violation of these conditions makes the license liable for cancellation of his license. The Supreme Court has also ordered that a license would make himself liable for cancellation of his license in the following cases.
That the licenses of those fair price shop owners
· who do not keep their shops open throughout the month during the stipulated period,
· fail to provide grain to BPL families strictly at BPL rates,
· keep the cards of BPL households with them,
· make false entries in the BPL cards,
· engage in black-marketing or siphoning away of grains to the open market, and
· hand over such ration shops to such other person/organizations, will be liable to be cancelled.
This order was passed on 2.5.2003 but no action has been taken by the states to enforce this order. It is therefore necessary that the special squads consist of persons drawn from the administration and the police and should be placed directly under the District Magistrate. These squads should be responsible for launching criminal prosecutions and also for recommending departmental action for suspension or cancellation of license, or imposing penalties No action has been taken against any official though it is admitted that no diversion of food grain is possible without the connivance of the officials of the department. . It is also important that these squads also have the powers to recommend action against officials in whose jurisdiction violations are detected or who is found to be involved in diversion of food grain. The Committee feels that there should be dedicated Special squads in every District for enforcement of the penal provisions of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. The Committee has suggested Zero Tolerance in the matter of enforcement in the Public Distribution System. Similarly a special squad should also be created at the State level for surprise checks whenever there is complaint requiring such action. Prosecutors should be specially trained for conducting cases under the Essential Commodities Act.
Special attention is also required to ensure speedy disposal of cases filed in courts. Special Courts may have to be set up in consultation with the High Court to ensure speedy disposal.
IDENTIFICATION OF BENEFICIARIES
1.1 A critical issue which has arisen in the course of the various visits by the Committee to different States pertains to proper identification of BPL beneficiaries. One of the critical factors which has resulted in the PDS not functioning properly is what can be termed as ‘exclusion and inclusion errors’. This issue is extremely pivotal in as much as till a rational criteria for the identification is put in place for the identification of true beneficiaries and an independent survey is conducted to ensure that the poorest of the poor are infact covered under the BPL/AAY categories as the case may be, all other measures being suggested by this Committee may be defeated as a faulty beneficiary list would continue to erode the effectiveness of the system.
1.2 The subject of identification is being discussed in the State report on Orissa although its relevance would be felt in every State report being submitted by the Committee.
1.3 In Orissa the identification of BPL families is yet not completed and it was observed that many people who are below poverty line have been excluded from TPDS benefits.
1.4 The State of Orissa enacted Orissa PDS (Control) Order 2008 which provides for the identification and review of beneficiaries. (Clause 21)
1.5 Clause 21 Orissa PDS ( Control) Order, 2008
A. Sub-Clause 1 provides that Identification of Beneficiaries under BPL, AAY and Annapurna Scheme shall be made in accordance with the guidelines issued by the Government.
requires a periodic review of Beneficiary List. The Gram Sabha in Rural areas
and Urban Local Bodies in Urban areas are required to review the lists of Below
Poverty Line, Antodaya Anna Yojana and
C. When the Committee held deliberations with the officers of the State of Orissa, its Principal Secretary was specifically asked if the State Government had formulated any guidelines for the purposes of identification of families living below the Poverty Line (BPL), including the ANTODYA families as envisaged in Para 1 of the Annexure to the PDS Control Order, 2001. He replied that no such criteria had been formulated. He further stated on being asked if the State Government had been getting the list of BPL and Antodaya families reviewed every year for the purposes of deletion of ineligible families and inclusion of eligible families as required in Para 2 of the Annexure to the PDS Control Order, it was stated that no such review was done.
D. It was also revealed that the State Government had not prescribed any Proforma to be filled on behalf of the head of the family while under taking the exercise of identification of BPL families as required in Para 3 of the Annexure to the PDS Control Order, 2001.
1.6 The Adverse aspects of the identification and how it drastically impacts food Security
A. The surprise visit to a remote village Chamunda in the District Sambhalpur revealed several lacunae. The inaccessible hilly terrain and dense forests has lead to lack of development. There were several grievances amongst tribal and poor population in the area. The Committee observed that most of the genuine persons do not possess any card. There are many families in the village who are very poor and living in very bad state having nothing to eat. This again leads to the inevitable inference that exclusion/inclusion errors are one of the major maladies afflicting the PDS.
B. Further in Kalahandi District, several lacunae on account of identification were apparent. The real problem in this area was in respect of identification. The last survey for the identification of BPL which has been accepted by the Government was done in the year 1997.
C. The Committee was informed that because no survey had been conducted in the area for many years, districts like Bolangir which are backward show 60 % population as BPL where as other districts which are more advanced and developed show 80% of their population as BPL. This itself shows that issue of wrong identification is a serious problem in the context of food security.
D. It was therefore noticed that the process of identification in the State which is a critical element for the success of the PDS was in total disarray. This led the Committee to delve in some depth into the issues concerning identification of beneficiaries which are detailed herein below.
II. IDENTIFICATION OF BPL FAMILIES
A. In June 1997, The Government of India launched the Targeted Public Distribution System (TPDS) with focus on the poor. Under the TPDS, States are required to formulate and implement foolproof arrangements for identification of the poor for delivery of foodgrains and for its distribution in a transparent and accountable manner at the FPS level.
B. The Scheme, when introduced was intended to benefit about 6 crore poor families for whom a quantity of about 72 lakh tones of foodgrains was earmarked annually.
C. To work out the population below the poverty line under the TPDS, there was a general consensus at the Food Ministers’ conference held in August 1996, for adopting the methodology used by the Expert Group set up by the Planning commission under the Chairman Ship of Late Prof. Lakadawala. Thus, the identification of the poor under the scheme is done by the States as per State-wise poverty estimates of the Planning Commission for 1993-94 based on the methodology of the Expert Group on estimation of proportion and number of poor chaired by Late Prof Lakadawala.
D. The number of BPL families has been increased w.e.f 1.12.2000 by shifting the base to the population projections of the Registrar General as on 1.3.2000 instead of the earlier population projections of 1995. With this increase the total number of BPL families is 652.03 lakhs as against 596.23 lakhs families originally estimated when TPDS was introduced in June 1997.
E. The Antyodaya Anna yojna (AAY) was launched in December 2000 for the estimated one crore poorest of the poor families among the BPL households. Later it has been expanded thrice to cover additional fifty lakh families every time. By December 2007, 2.43 lakh AAY families have been identified and ration cards issued to them. The Present monthly allocation of foodgrains under AAY is around 8.49 lakh tones per month as on December, 2007.
F. The scale of issue under APL, BPL and AAY has been revised to 35 kg.per family per month with effect from 1.4.2002 with a view to enhancing the food security at household level and liquidating surplus stocks of foodgrains in the Central Pool.
2.2 Annexe to the Public Distribution System Control Order, 2001
A. Identification of families living below the poverty line:
(1) State Governments shall formulate suitable guidelines for the purpose of identification of families living Below the Poverty Line (BPL), including the Antyodaya families, as per the estimates adopted by the Central Government. Care will be taken to ensure that the families so identified are really the poorest. The exercise of identification of BPL and Antyodaya families, wherever it has not been done already, shall be completed within three months of the issue of this Order.
(2) State Governments shall get the lists of BPL and Antyodaya families reviewed every year for the purpose of deletion of ineligible families and inclusion of eligible families.
(3) While undertaking the exercise of identification or review of BPL and Antyodaya families, each State Government shall prescribe a suitable proforma to be filled up by or on behalf of the head of a family.
(4) The data provided in the prescribed proforma shall be verified by the authority designated by the State Government for the purpose. The said authority shall also certify the correctness of the information contained in the proforma.
(5) Gram Sabhas shall finalise the list of beneficiaries belonging to BPL and Antyodaya categories drawn up by the designated authority in respect of the area under their respective jurisdictions.
(6) Where there are no Gram Sabhas, the local representative bodies shall finalise the list of beneficiaries belonging to BPL and Antyodaya categories within their respective jurisdictions.
(7) The designated authority of the State Government or the local representative bodies including Gram Sabhas and Gram Panchayats which have been entrusted with the task of identification of beneficiaries, shall verify and certify the information in the prescribed proforma for BPL and Antyodaya families.
from Ministry of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs (Government of
Ministry of Civil Supplies, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution issued
guidelines for the implementation of the
TPDS to all states and
B. Guidelines in the year 1997
1. To work out the Population Below Poverty line BPL it is proposed to adopt the provisional estimates arrived at by the Planning Commission for the year 1993-94 adopting the methodology of “ Expert Group on estimation of proportion and number of poor Constituted by the Planning Commission under the Chairman ship of Late Prof. Lakadawala (Expert Group). According to the official methodology so far adopted, the number and percentage of Below Poverty Line population for 1993-94 works out to 14.98crores persons and 16.82% respectively. As per the Expert group methodology this worked out to 32.03 crores and 35.97%. The Expert Group methodology according to the Deputy Chairman, Planning Commission gives “ poverty estimates closest to the ground reality” and as such it is proposed to adopt them for the Targeted PDS.
2. While these estimates give the number of persons and percentage of BPL population at State Level, identification at the micro level of the population Below Poverty Line can be done as indicated below:
i. The quinquennial surveys made by the Ministry of Rural Areas and Employment for implementation of IRDP etc on household living Below Poverty Line can be a basis. However, the overall number identified should be limited within the population Below Poverty Line as fixed by the Union Planning Commission adopting the methodology of Prof. Lakdawala’s Expert group.
ii. Gram Panchayats and Gram Sabhas should be involved in the initial identification of eligible families.
iii. Final identification should be made after verification of Doubtful cases.
iv. As regards urban population, slum dwellers will generally qualify for the BPL. Applications, if any, received from non-slum areas should be verified to identify eligible beneficiaries.
v. The thrust will be to include only the really poor and vulnerable sections of the society such as landless agricultural labours, marginal farmers, rural artisans/craftsmen such as potters, tappers, weavers, blacksmiths, carpenters, etc. in rural areas and slum dwellers and persons earning their livelihood on a daily basis in the informal sector like porters, coolies, rickshaw pullers and hand-cart pullers, fruit and flower sellers on the payment etc.., in urban areas. The above criteria is indicated only by way of illustration and is in no way an exhaustive list of those who could be brought within the ambit of the Below Poverty Line. The total number identified, however, should be within the limits of BPL population indicated by the Planning Commission.
A. Ministry of Rural Development, GOI (MoRD) conducts BPL census in all the rural areas of the country in the beginning of each Five Year Plan, through the State Governments/ UT administrations fro identification of persons living below the poverty line for targeting them under the Programmes of the Ministry.
B. BPL census 1992 (8th Plan 1992-97):. In the BPL Census conducted by MoRD during 1992, income was used for defining BPL households in contrast to the expenditure route adopted by the Planning Commission for estimation of Poverty. The census used self-reported household incomes to identify BPL households. However, given the difficulties of measuring income, particularly when incomes come largely from self-employment in agriculture, the self-reported income approach was abandoned in the 1997 BPL census.
C. BPL census 1997 (9th Plan 1997-2000): MoRD conducted 1997 Census taking the view that poverty line should be estimated in terms of the Expenditure of the households. The basic criteria defining a BPL household was the monthly per capita expenditure of the household. If the per capita household expenditure was less than the poverty line (the cut off limit of income adopted by the Planning Commission), the household was defined as poor. The reference period or recall adopted was the last 30 day’s. Such households were considered to be poor and eligible for assistance during the Ninth plan provided that the other basic conditions laid down n the guidelines were met.
D. The BPL census schedule has two parts. Part A and Part B. In Part A a set of five questions were asked of each and every household in the village for quick assessment of the status of household .
(i) whether operated size of land was more than two hectares;
(ii) whether owned a ‘pucca house’ as defined in the Population Census;
(iii) whether annual income was more than Rs. 20,000;
(iv) whether owned any of the following consumer durables: television, refrigerator, ceiling fan, motor cycle/scooter and three wheelers; and,
(v) whether owned farm equipment such as tractor, power-tiller, or combined thresher/harvesters
E. If households answered in the affirmative to any one of the five questions, they were declared to be visibly non-poor. This was done to differentiate the “visibly poor” from the “visibly non-poor” households in the village relatively quickly and in an inexpensive manner.
F. In the case of those households that do not fulfill even one of the five criteria laid down in Part A, would the surveyor proceed to gather information in Part B of the Schedule covering sex , age, physical disability, educational status, social Group, religion, occupation type of housing ( ownership) , etc.
2.5 The methodology of 1997 Census faced following Criticism:-
1. The exclusion criteria adopted for excluding visibly non-poor was not appropriate, as possession of even a ceiling fan would categorize a family as non-poor.
2. Non-availability of official poverty lines for all states/UTs; Estimates of poverty lines were available only for 17 States and the estimate of poverty line for the nearest State was applied for the remaining States/UTs. This has reportedly been unfavourable to the States for which poverty lines were not estimated separately.
3. Uniform criteria were adopted for all the rural areas throughout the country, without allowing for inter-State variations particularly in respect of hilly and remote areas.
4. Not allowing new households to be declared poor in the interim period before the next survey is instituted. There was no provision for adding to the BPL list, after finalization , by way of inclusion of persons who have subsequently become poor.
2.6 BPL Census 2002 (10th Plan 2002-2007):-
A. The BPL Census 2002 was based on methodology of score based ranking or rural households, for which 13 socio-economic parameters were used. The state governments were directed to finalize survey by 31/3/2003.
B. As per the guidelines for the BPL Census 2002, whereas
estimation of poverty helped to assess the magnitude of poverty, identification
of households below BPL was necessary for targeting them under various poverty
alleviation programs. The improved design for the BPL census 2002 adopted a
normative approach for identification of the rural poor with score-based
ranking of each household based on quality of life, (not income or expenditure
approach) which included both economic and social indicators. The schedule for
canvassing information had 13 cardinal indicators for which scores had to be
assigned on a relative scale together with some non-scorable variables used for
categorizing households into very poor, poor, not so poor and non poor. For the
BPL census 2002, the NSSO survey mentioned categorically that the total number
of BPL persons identified were not to exceed by more than 10% of the number of
BPL persons estimated by the Planning Commission for
C. The following States and UTs have finalized the BPL list based on the BPL Census 2002 
Name of the State
Name of the State
10 Madhya Pradesh
D. Commissioners of the Supreme Court [W P (Civil) No. 196 of 2001] critically analyzed the 13 socio-economic indicators used for 2002 BPL Census conducted by Ministry of Rural Development for identification of BPL ( beneficiaries) of its own schemes. The criteria for identifying BPL the house hold should be of a directly verifiable and observable nature. Most of the 13 criteria, on the other hand, are not easily or clearly verifiable. 
1. Land Holdings: If a land holdings-related question is to be used as a question in BPL Census 2009 it should perhaps simply ask whether the person has any land at all or not, i.e. whether the person is landless or not. Such a question would obviate the difficulty of investgating the issues of land quality and that of sources of irrigation. The question of irrigation, non-irrigation or irrigation by Private/ Public entity seems vague and unreasonable.
Type of House:
Census criteria used by the Registrar General of
3. Availability of Clothing: This question investigates whether a person owns less than two pair of closing at a minimum, increasing up to “more than 10 pair”. This question is flawed for several reasons. First, in colder climates more clothing is required than in warmer climates. Second, it is unclear from the question whether under garments are counted among clothing or not. Answers to such question are bound to lead to very unclear outcomes.
4. Food Security: This question is comparable to the NSS question on “whether a family gets two square meals a day”. Even if all the members of a household eat two meals per day there may be serious problems with the quality of the meal, as reflected in the calorie intake and protein intake per meal. Moreover, there is no way the answer to the question will reveal how the food is being shared between the man in the household on the one hand, and the women & girls on the other.
5. Sanitation : This is a perverse question and encourages totally perverse behavior. This kind of question would discourage families from actually investing in a private latrine.
6. Ownership of Consumer Durables: possession of a TV requires a much higher purchasing power than possession of an electric fan or radio. Therefore simply counting, as the BPL Census questionnaire does, whether the household has any such item or “all items” is not a meaningful exercise. However, the expert group can consider using possession of consumer durables (for example, a motorcycle, colour TV, Fridge) as exclusion criterion, as a criterion for excluding a house hold from the BPL category.
7. Literacy status of highest literate: The lowest scoring category under this criterion is “Illiterate” while the highest scoring category “Post Graduate”. There is slight risk that this question will not yield very meaningful answers for many reasons. First, even with a post graduate degree the holder of the degree may still be unemployed. An unemployed person may still be thus a head of poor house hold. Second, what means will the investigator use to interrogate and then confirm the educational status of the highest literate is also not clear.
8. Status of House hold labour: as formulated in the questionnaire, this question does not address the problems that in most rural house hold women and children work along side the adult male on the family farm. In any case, it is unclear how the investigator will ascertain that only the adult male in the house hold is working, while the woman and children are not.
9. Means of livelihood: This question asks whether means of livelihood is casual labour (zero points), or subsistence cultivation (1) or artisan (2), or salary (3), or others (4). This question simply fails to understand that the poor always have multiple sources of livelihood, and members of a household are likely to be engaged in different kinds of work, and even the same individual may engage in different kinds of work and derive income from those sources at different times of the year. In other word it is impossible for house hold, while answering the question, to merely tick one of the five listed answers to the question.
10. Status of Children: This question investigates whether the children are “not going to school and working”, or “going to school and working”, or “going to school and not working”. The answer to this question would be either perverse or not meaningful if it encourages parents to force the child to not go to school and only work, simply because it would entitle them to zero points and hence increase the chances of the household being counted as BPL.
11. Type of Indebtedness: This question, of all questions among the 13 criteria, shows the least understanding of ground realities of the rural indebtedness. The poorest people lack assets, which can be used as collateral, and hence are unable to borrow. But this question gives the highest score “4” to the household that is not indebted. In another words, the poorest house hold might end up getting four points and thus rule itself out of the BPL category.
12. Reason for Migration: This question gives the lowest score to the house hold which has a member migrating for casual work, and gives the score of 3 to non-migrants, and score of 4 to those migrating for reasons other than casual work. Quite of apart from the fact that this question does not distinguish households from which only one member has migrated from those from which more than one member might have migrated, it is entirely unclear why the reason for migration should merit different scores for the purposes of determining whether a family is BPL or not. Not surprisingly, the West Bengal Govt. excluded the criteria in its rural survey.
13. Preference of Assistance: This question is also among the most meaningless among the all criteria. It does not attempt to establish the current status of a household in respect of a particular tangible attribute of well-being, but rather interrogates whether the household would like to receive assistance in the form of wage employment (zero) or self-employment (1) or training (2) or housing (3), or loan more than rupees one lakh (4). Given that such a question would yield answers that are less than meaningful when comparing across categories of answers, the West Bengal Government eliminated this criterion from its rural survey.
2.7 Comments, Suggestions and Criticism of the 2002 criteria by the Programme Evaluation Organisation (PEO) of the Planning Commission:-
A. The report of the (PEO) dated March 2005 suggested following things:-
1. It would be appropriate to do away with the methodology of identifying poor families on the basis of Income/expenditure criterion, as identifying sources of income at the household level and measuring them with precision on such a large scare are fraught with many problems.
2. The report further suggested that criteria for BPL identification should include only easily observable qualitative criteria relating to occupations, assets or any other qualitative criteria relating to occupations, assets or any other qualitative indicators of economic insecurity.
of population with food insecurity need not necessarily be identified with
Planning Commission’s poverty ratio. Analysing the survey data of NSSO and
Planning commission’s poverty estimate tends to suggest that the size of the
population with food insecurity will be larger than the size indicated by
Planning Commission for many States. In some states like Haryana, Himachal
4. Those families who do not have a secure source of regular income, should be netted into BPL category irrespective of their current income levels (i.e. those with economic insecurity). As many daily wage earning families have been left out of BPL category because their current income levels are above the Planning commission’s Poverty Line.
5. The set of assets and their relative weights need to be specified with utmost care and region-wise. The criterion should be widely pre-tested too.
6. Active and effective involvement of the PRIs should be built into the process of identification of the poor.
7. Since the BPL identification survey is so critical to the success of TPDS, it is appropriate that this be carried out in all the States, through a collaborative endeavour with reputed agencies such as the NSSO, NCAER and State level research / survey institutions. The database so created may be computerized for effective monitoring and regular updating.
B. Kinds of Identification Errors and their Implications as identified by the PEO
C. It is observed in the Report citing Cornia and Stewart (1993), the exclusion errors (EE) are indeed very high for most states in the TPDS regime. However, in the States of Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu, the EE is low and IE is high. The EE in Karnataka could also have been low, had there not been a large scale shadow ownership of BPL cards. The three Southern States exhibit a different pattern from the rest because they have historically followed a policy of extending the benefit of subsidized food grain to a larger section of the population. In fact, in Karnataka too, the exclusion errors arising out of APL-BPL identification errors is as low as in Andra Pradesh. However, when the exclusion of BPL households due to shadow ownership errors is included, the EE for Karnataka assumes a very high value implying a major weakness in the implementation of TPDS in the State.
2.8 Inclusion Errors - Three States viz, Andra Pradesh, Karnataka and Tamil Nadu have exhibited very high inclusion errors. High inclusion error implies diversion of PDS benefits to unintended beneficiaries and hence, raises cost of delivery and burden of budgetary food subsidies.
2.9 Double Counting Errors - Gujarat Haryana, Karnataka, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu and U.P have issued a large number of excess ration cards over the number of households.
with nine non-monetary indicators of poverty under Urban Basic Services for the
Poor (UBSP) in
B. Keeping in view the simplicity and community acceptance of the above methodology, it was applied to Kudumbashree programme of Kerala. Advantages of this methodology included – easy to understand, accepted by the community itself, reduced patronage and arbitrariness, facilitated ranking based on severity of poverty, enabled monitoring of progress, ensured ownership of data, facilitated micro-level planning.
III. MoRD Expert Group for 2008 BPL Census
On 12th August 2008 Ministry of Rural Development constituted an Expert Group under the Chairman ship of M.Shankar to advise the Ministry of Rural Development on the methodology for conducting the Below Poverty Line Census for 11th Five Year Plan. The expert group consists of 16 other members including non official members.
For the purposes of completeness the creation and expansion of the AAY category is briefly described below,
4.1 AAY is a step in the direction of making TPDS aim at reducing hunger among the poorest segments of the BPL population. A NSS Exercise points towards the fact that about 5% of the total population in the country sleeps without two square meals a day. In order to make TPDS more focused and targeted towards this category of population, the “Antodaya Anna Yojana”(AAY).
4.2 Identification of the Antodaya Families and issuing
of distinctive ration cards to these families is the responsibility of the
4.3 Presently, foodgrains are supplied at a rate Rs 2/- per kg for wheat and Rs. 3/- per kg. for rice. The scale of issue that was initially 25kg. per family per month has been increased to 35kg. per family per month with effect from 1st April 2002.
4.4 First Expansion of AAY
The AAY scheme has been expanded in 2003-2004 by adding another 50 lakh BPL households headed by widows or terminally ill persons or disabled persons or persons aged 60 years or more with no assured means of subsistence or societal support. With that increase 1.5crores(i.e. 23% of BPL ) families have been covered under the AAY.
4.5 Second Expansion of AAY
From 3rd August 2004 AAY has been further expanded by another 50 lakh BPL families. The guidelines stipulated the following criteria:-
With this increase, the number of AAY families has been increased to 2 crores (i.e. 30.66% of BPL families)
4.6 Third Expansion of AAY
It was again announced in the Union Budget 2005-2006 , that AAY is to be further expanded to Cover another 50 lakh BPL households thus increasing its overage to 2.5 crore households. (i.e. 38% of BPL).
5.1 The Committee recognizes the fact that it is not an expert body to prescribe identification guidelines and is therefore not venturing into any such task. However, the Committee recognizing the critical nature and importance of identification and the fact that exclusion and inclusion error are a very serious malady afflicting the PDS, recommends that the expert body constituted by the MORD in terms of the order of the Supreme Court dated 14 February 2006, give its recommendations in a time bound manner and each State within a time frame fixed by the Hon’ble Court prescribe transparent criteria of its own for identification keeping in mind local conditions.
such guidelines are in place, as suggested in the
5.3 There would be an amnesty period of four weeks where persons holding bogus cards could surrender them without liability. However on the expiry of this period the above mentioned intensive door to door verification would be conducted and during that verification if any bogus card is detected both the holder as well as the officers who had recommended the bogus card would be prosecuted under Section 7 and other Sections of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 without exception. The Officers can be proceeded against departmentally and severely punished. Widest possible publicity must be given to the amnesty scheme.
5.4 There is a need to revisit income criterion prescribed for the BPL category. The government/MORD committee may also consider using consumption criteria that is to say calorie intake per person per day as an indicator of poverty as the minimal objective to be achieved by TPDS is to ensure that every poor person gets two square meals a day. This is recommended in as much as a purely income based criteria may in certain circumstances be misleading in terms of actual determination of persons below the poverty line. However the estimation of poverty should not be made on a criteria which is less than the minimum wage fixed by the state for agricultural labourers or the wage fixed by the Central Government under Section 6 of the NREG Act 2005. It may not be out of place to point out that several states the minimum wage for agricultural labour is in the range of Rs 100 and even the NSSO in its estimate fixes the estimate of expenditure at Rs 20 per capita per day which works out to Rs 100 per day per family (a family is taken as 5 members).
above mentioned recommendations are required to be put in place on an urgent
basis in the State of
5.6 The abovementioned Committee set up by the MORD is essentially to devise a criteria for identifying the correct beneficiary in a rural setting. For the urban scenario however a different criteria will have to be devised. The committee in its report on Delhi had suggested that the basis for determination as to whether a person is BPL or not should be based on the minimum wage payable to an unskilled workman in the area i.e. to say if the person is earning below this amount he would be deemed to be below the poverty Line.
5.7 The Committee is also reiterating its
suggestion/recommendation made in the
5.8 It is however relevant to point out that State like Karnataka which have adopted a system like EBPL must ensure that the BPL Quota is not expanded to unrealistic levels for political considerations. In this context, it may be noticed that the Central Government has warned State that it would cut Rice supply under APL if the no. of BPL beneficiaries is not brought down.
In the State
i. Angul block
ii. Athamallik block
iii. Banarpal block
iv. Chhendipada block
v. Kaniha block
vi. Kishorenagar block
vii. Pallhara block
viii. Talcher block
1.2 Angul block comprises of 32 gram panchahyat’s (GP’s) which in turn cover 219 villages. The District NIC centre is situated at Angul block and is equipped with VSAT facility. It was further revealed that all Districts in Orissa are equipped with VSAT facility and broad band connectivity has also been provided up to the block level, provided by BSNL. For eg, in Angul District the farthest village from the block head quarters at Angul is Tikarpada which is at a distance of 70 kms from Angul and is well connected by road. VSAT connectivity at the block level was not satisfactory as the speed is slow. Broadband was however working well.
1.3 The Committee was informed that in order to provide connectivity through optical fiber up to the panchayat level a project called the OSWAN (Orissa State Wide Area Network) is being implemented and the tender has been awarded to SPANCO Delhi.
1.4 Efforts at automation have however been taken by the State in respect of Land records and public access to such records have also been provided on the internet at www.bhulekh.ori.nic.in. The system seems to be working well at the Block Level and therefore a similar attempt at automating the PDS is not difficult.
1.5 A detailed discussion on Compterizartion is being provided in a separate report being submitted to the Hon’ble Supreme Court and the inferences there in may be read as part and parcel of this report.
A. That broad band connectivity is available till the block level at present coupled with the fact that connectivity through optic fiber is likely to link the panchayats in the not too distant future is extremely encouraging as connectivity is one of the major areas of concern when one is considering the implementation of the smart card system coupled with the PoS device.
B. As has been highlighted earlier in this report, the primary and the most essential step in the attempt to cure the ills of exclusion and inclusion errors which plague the prevailing system is the carrying out of an independent and comprehensive survey of the BPL population. The fact that land records have been completely digitized and posted on the internet in Orissa, will make it possible to cross-verify the possible land holdings in the name of each existing BPL card holder and thereby eliminate people with substantial holdings who although not falling within the BPL category, might still be holding BPL cards and drawing ration using the same. This will cure the problem of inclusion errors thereby plugging leakages.
C. The highlight of the study was that the possibilities of computerization exist at the block level with broad band connectivity thereby making the online system with or without smart cards a possibility. Further as indicated above the existing land records computerization will also help in eliminating bogus /ineligible card holders in the eventual survey that the committee would recommend. Schemes like the NREG are already being implemented through a web based system of uploading information were reviewed both in the Angul Block as well as in the Talcher block offices. It would therefore not be difficult to implement a dedicated PDS online-fully automated system in these areas.
1. There is unholy nexus between the transporters, Storage agents, Fair Price Shop owners, Officials of OSCSC and the Department of Food and Civil Supply in large scale diversion of PDS food grains meant for the poor. PDS is inefficient and corrupt. To stem the rot, the use of Information Communication Technology (ICT) appears to be the only solution. By use of modern technology, there would be less human intervention and transparency will be brought in the system and in allotment of food stocks to be sold at the shops.
2. For a FPS to earn a marginal profit there has to be minimum 500 cards. Where the cards are less than that, FPS runs on loss. Study of the Committee shows that merely increasing the commission will not result in making the FPS a profitable proposition. It is a well documented fact that the FPS owner is in business for the purpose of diversion or for political influence or other influence that he can wield by being a FPS retailer. The FPS dealer also gets a statuts of sorts in the locality. Any amount of increase in commission will not stem the rot. FPS owners are deliberately not ready to sell groceries other than PDS food grains. The reason is not far to seek. By opening shops for two or three days and selling PDS food grain in connivance with Government/Corporation officials is in itself a lucrative and effortless proposition for him. When there is no profit or there is loss as complained by FPS owner, the question that arises is then why is he sticking to the shop. The concept of a stand alone FPS should be changed. This way he can earn profit and shop will remain open throughout the month. Moreover attached numbers of cards mean a set number of customers in any case who may buy other grocery items from that shop.
3. Retail Licenses should be given to Kirana/Grocery shop owners, Women Self-help groups having a proven track record and Panchayats. Since running an FPS is not a profitable proposition, any scheme of allotting the shop to unemployed graduates or the like has no meaning. It must be understood that these shops have not to be licensed for the benefit of the shopkeepers but for the benefit of the consumers.
4. There must be a clear demarcation of responsibilities amongst the different entities involved in the PDS. No entity must have an overlapping function. The prevailing system whereby all the entities involved in the PDS have interwoven responsibilities must be immediately done away with. The responsibility of identification of beneficiaries, issue of ration cards and the appointment of FPS has to be with the Food and Civil supply Department. Role of distribution would be the responsibility of the Corporation. Various committees namely the Retail Level Advisory Committee, Taluk/Block Level Advisory Committee, District level Advisory Committee and State Level Advisory Committee should only deal with vigilance aspect.
5. The existing system of giving the abovementioned committees a role in appointments of dealers which has resulted in a direct conflict of interest must be done away with immediately. The Government should frame/ amend rules regarding allotment of license in a transparent manner. Any vacancy for the FPS should be properly advertised. The applications received can be scrutinized by the officials to ensure that they comply with the eligibility conditions. Names of the applicants can be made public and objections invited from the public bodies responsible for vigilance. Spot verification can be done by the officials of the department. There can be a committee to take final decisions.
6. PDS operation should be based on the principle of zero tolerance. Any infraction of the rules and regulations or instructions should invite strict action not only against the FPS owner but also the concerned official. It is the Inspector or his higher officers who should be held accountable. Unfortunately, there is no accountability and there is no monitoring. If a bogus card is found not only the FPS owner but the Inspector and other concerned officials as well should be prosecuted for offences under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and also Indian Penal Code. It is a known fact that bogus cards are in abundance and it is another source of diversion of PDS food-grains. The State Government must devise a scheme to eliminate bogus cards.
7. The system of storage agents (storage agency) is one of the main sources of diversion of PDS food-grains. This system should end forthwith. State/Corporation has adequate storage facilities and sufficient resources to man the same. Some of the godowns which are owned by the Corporation have been let out to storage agents. Panchayat Raj Department has 6000 godowns of 50 MT capacity and 300 godowns of 1000 MT capacity. Panchayat Raj Department and also the Urban Development Department have offered to construct more godowns, if so required by the Corporation.
8. Chairman of the Corporation should not be a political/private person. His appointment should be transparent. Corporation should be run strictly on a professional basis. The earlier practice of appointing the Secretary of the Food and Supplies Department was better and should be restored.
Redressal mechanism should be set up, with a twenty four hour Help line as
suggested in report on
10. PDS food-grains should be transported only in tamper-proof bags like HDPE bags instead of jute bags and PDS commodities should be supplied to the beneficiary in small packages of 5 & 10 kgs.
11. Mobile vans for distribution of PDS food grain have proved their utility. Number of mobile vans be increased.
12. As of today, there is no enforcement worth the name and no vigilance. Vigilance Committees are non functional. Vigilance Committees must meet on a fixed venue on a particular date and time, e.g. the District level Vigilance Committee should meet in the Office of the District Collector every second month on the second Friday at 4.00 P.M.
13. The State Government should fix the responsibly of the officials of the administrative machinery to convene the meetings and ensure the presence of the members. Rules can provide that any member who does not attend two consecutive meetings would be replaced. The Secretary of the Department of Food and Supply should be responsible for convening the meetings at the State level, the District Magistrate should be responsible for the District level Committee, Block Development Officer should be responsible for the block and FPS level committees.
14. Since one of the reasons for the failure of the system has been wrong identification of beneficiaries, urgent steps need to be taken for proper identification so as to ensure there is no inclusion or exclusion errors. It may not be out of place to mention that the State Government has not furnished a BPL list based on the 2002 criteria.
15. There is a need to revisit income criterion prescribed for the BPL category. The government/MORD committee may also consider using consumption criteria that is to say calorie intake per person per day as an indicator of poverty as the minimal objective to be achieved by TPDS is to ensure that every poor person gets two square meals a day. This is recommended in as much as a purely income based criteria may in certain circumstances be misleading in terms of actual determination of persons below the poverty line. However the estimation of poverty should not be made on a criteria which is less than the minimum wage fixed by the state for agricultural labourers or the wage fixed by the Central Government under Section 6 of the NREG Act 2005. It may not be out of place to point out that several states the minimum wage for agricultural labour is in the range of Rs 100 and even the NSSO in its estimate fixes the estimate of expenditure at Rs 20 per capita per day which works out to Rs 100 per day per family (a family is taken as 5 members).
The abovementioned Committee set up by the
MORD is essentially to devise a criteria for identifying the correct
beneficiary in a rural setting. For the urban scenario however a different
criteria will have to be devised. The committee in its report on Delhi had suggested that the basis for
determination as to whether a person is BPL or not should be based on the
minimum wage payable to an unskilled workman in the area i.e. to say if the
person is earning below this amount he would be deemed to be below the poverty
Line. The same criteria for the State of
is also reiterating its suggestion/recommendation made in the
18. Since August 2008, the State has formulated a scheme of giving rice to BPL and AAY category at the rate of Rs.2 per Kg. Government has fixed days at which the rice should be distributed. This has increased the demand for BPL cards. There must be careful monitoring of this scheme to ensure that Extra BPL cards should not result in depriving the real beneficiaries who are to be targeted under the TPDS. Similar schemes are being introduced by various States. These schemes which seemed to be driven by political motivation rather than any desire to ensure food security need to be carefully monitored. Increasing the BPL population to unrealistic level is not only a drain on the resources of the State but may also act as a serious disincentive to hard work on part of the population of the State.
19. The Committee has given a comprehensive report on computerization and recommends that the same be acted upon. In the report the Committee has suggested the whole process of computerization of the Public Distribution System which includes using electronic weighing systems and integrating the same with automated allocation and delivery systems.
 M.S Swaminathan Report The Business Line Internet Edition,
 Reform Odissi: Financial Express dated
 M.S Swaminathan Report The Business Line Internet Edition,
 Food Insecurity Atlas of Orissa , UNFP,
 Orissa Human Development Report HD: From Analysis to action: www.undp.org.in
of Meeting dated
of Public hearing held at
 The Panchayat Raj Department has 6000 godown of 50 MT capacity and 300 godown of 100 MT capacity but the OSCSC is not interested in hiring these godowns. The Panchayat Raj Department and the Urban Development are also prepared to construct more godowns if required by the OSCSC. (refere to the Minutes of meeting on 16/10/08 at Rajbhwan).
 Company Law, (Sixteenth edt.) at Page 1693 (Last Para).
 Letter no. 11214/ dated 28/10/06 of MD of OSCSC to all Collectors.
 PEO, Performance Evaluation of Targeted Public Distribution system – 2005, (at pg vi and 50).
 Annual Report2007-2008, Ministry of consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, GOI ,Page 27.
 Annual Report2007-2008, Ministry of consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, GOI ,Page 27.
 Ibid., at Page 28
 Ibid., at Page 29
 Report of the Expert Group on Identification of Households Below Poverty Line set up by MoRD in 2002.
 Critique by Commissioners of the Supreme Court [W P (Civil) No. 196 of 2001]
 PEO Report
 Annual Report2007-2008, Ministry of consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, GOI ,Page 27-29
 Section 6 of the NREG reads : (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, the Central Government may, by notification, specify the wage rate for the purposes of this Act ;
Provided that different rates of wages may be specified for different areas:
Provided further that the wage rate specified from time to time under any such notification shall not be at a rate less than sixty rupees per day.
(2) Until such time as a wage rate is fixed by the Central Government in respect of any area in a State, the minimum wage fixed by the State Government under section 3 of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 for agricultural, shall be considered as the wage rate applicable to that area.